PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16398845

Routine neonatal postextubation chest physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the effects of a neonatal postextubation programme on the incidence of postextubation collapse and adverse outcomes. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was carried out at the Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane. Mechanically ventilated infants were randomized into one of two groups, physiotherapy group--which involved a regimen of chest wall percussion and oropharyngeal suctioning and control group - which involved suctioning without the percussion unless indicated. Chest X-rays were taken at 6 h and at 24 h postextubation. The primary outcome measure was postextubation collapse as determined by a paediatric radiologist blinded to the group allocation. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven neonates were enrolled in the trial between 1997 and 1999. After an interim analysis, the trial was stopped early. No statistically significant difference was shown in the rate of postextubation collapse (15 of 87 (17.2%) physiotherapy group and 17 of 86 (19.8%) control group (P = 0.85)). No differences were shown between the groups in the number of apnoeic or bradycardic events, duration of requirement for supplemental oxygen or the need for re-intubation within 24 h postextubation. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial suggest that a routine neonatal postextubation chest physiotherapy programme for all infants is not indicated. There was no evidence that chest physiotherapy is associated with any adverse outcomes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C E Bagley, P H Gray, D I Tudehope, V Flenady, A D Shearman, A Lamont. 2005. Routine neonatal postextubation chest physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2005.00728.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗