PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16402123

Molecular targets underlying general anaesthesia.

Abstract

The discovery of general anaesthesia, over 150 years ago, revolutionised medicine. The ability to render a patient unconscious and insensible to pain made modern surgery possible and general anaesthetics have become both indispensible as well as one of the most widely used class of drugs. Their extraordinary chemical diversity, ranging from simple chemically inert gases to complex barbiturates, has baffled pharmacologists, and ideas about how they might work have been equally diverse. Until relatively recently, thinking was dominated by the notion that anaesthetics acted 'nonspecifically' by dissolving in the lipid bilayer portions of nerve membranes. While this simple idea could account for the chemical diversity of general anaesthetics, it has proven to be false and it is now generally accepted that anaesthetics act by binding directly to sensitive target proteins. For certain intravenous anaesthetics, such as propofol and etomidate, the target has been identified as the GABA(A) receptor, with particular subunits playing a crucial role. For the less potent inhalational agents, the picture is less clear, although a relatively small number of targets have been identified as being the most likely candidates. In this review, I will describe the work that led up to the identification of the GABA(A) receptor as the key target for etomidate and propofol and contrast this with current progress that has been made in identifying the relevant targets for other anaesthetics, particularly the inhalational agents.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nicholas P Franks. 2006. Molecular targets underlying general anaesthesia.. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706441

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine administration during isoflurane anaesthesia in Shetland ponies.

BACKGROUND: The arterial pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine enantiomers after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine i.v. administration were evaluated in seven gelding ponies in a crossover study (2-month interval). METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with isoflurane in oxygen via a face-mask and then maintained at each pony's individual MAC. Racemic ketamine (2.2 mg kg(-1)) or S-ketamine (1.1 mg kg(-1)) was injected in the right jugular vein. Blood samples were collected from the right carotid artery before and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 min after ketamine administration. Ketamine and norketamine enantiomer plasma concentrations were determined by capillary electrophoresis. Individual R-ketamine and S-ketamine concentration vs time curves were analysed by non-linear least square regression two-compartment model analysis using PCNonlin. Plasma disposition curves for R-norketamine and S-norketamine were described by estimating AUC, C(max), and T(max). Pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (R(f)), tidal volume (V(T)), minute volume ventilation (V(E)), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PE'(CO(2))), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were also evaluated. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of S- and R-ketamine administered in the racemic mixture or S-ketamine administered separately did not differ significantly. Statistically significant higher AUC and C(max) were found for S-norketamine compared with R-norketamine in the racemic group. Overall, R(f), V(E), PE'(CO(2)), and MAP were significantly higher in the racemic group, whereas PR was higher in the S-ketamine group. CONCLUSIONS: Norketamine enantiomers showed different pharmacokinetic profiles after single i.v. administration of racemic ketamine in ponies anaesthetised with isoflurane in oxygen (1 MAC). Cardiopulmonary variables require further investigation.

Anesthesia, General↗