PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16412971

Chronic allograft nephropathy.

Abstract

With the advent of calcineurin inhibitors, the success of kidney and other solid-organ transplants has improved significantly from the standpoint of reducing the incidence of acute rejection. Over the past 2 decades, both short-term allograft survival and acute rejection rates have dramatically improved with improved diagnostic and therapeutic techniques such as standardized pathology scoring; potent antirejection drugs such as anti-thymocyte globulin, interleukin-2 receptor antibodies, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil; and improved infection control such as valganciclovir and antifungal therapy. However, long-term graft loss has remained at nearly constant levels over the same period of time, with the average half-life of a deceased-donor kidney transplant in the United States remaining approximately 1 decade. In addition to death with a functioning allograft and calcineurin toxicity, a chronic fibrotic process-known at various times as chronic rejection, chronic allograft dysfunction, and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN)-account for the leading causes of transplant failure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pankaj Baluja, Lukas Haragsim, Zoltan Laszik. 2006. Chronic allograft nephropathy.. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2005.11.004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Composite tissue allograft extends a helping hand to transplant immunologists.

The first successful human hand transplantation, performed on September 1998, has translated the scope of 'composite tissue allotransplantation' from research concepts into clinical practice. Beyond microsurgical problems that have been overcome several years ago, the main obstacle that still prevents the generalization of composite tissue allotransplantation is immunologic. This review, which summarizes the evidence obtained both from experimental animal models and from the first recipients of a hand transplant, is focused on the two immunological characteristics of composite allografts that set them apart from other solid organ allografts: (i) they contain skin tissue that elicits a strong immune response; and (ii) they contain lymphoid tissues (such as bone marrow and lymph nodes) that have the potential both to attack the recipient, and also to down-modulate the host immune response and induce tolerance. While on one hand, the composite tissue allografts raise new challenges to transplant immunologists, on the other they provide answers to questions that have remained unresolved for a long time. In this sense, composite tissue allografts extend a helping hand to transplant immunologists.

Graft Survival↗