PubMed · 16425488
End games: euthanasia under interminable scrutiny.
Abstract
It is increasingly asserted that the disagreements of abstract principle between adversaries in the euthanasia debate fail to account for the complex, particular and ambiguous experiences of people at the end of their lives. A greater research effort into experiences, meaning, connection, vulnerability, and motivation is advocated, during which the euthanasia 'question' should remain open. I argue that this is a normative strategy, which is felicitous to the status quo and further medicalises the end of life, but which masquerades as a value-neutral assertion about needing more knowledge.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Malcolm Parker. 2005. End games: euthanasia under interminable scrutiny.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00462.x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.