PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1644052

Drug interactions in epilepsy.

Abstract

The abolition of seizures using a single antiepileptic agent can be expected in more than 80% of patients, although not necessarily with the first drug tried. The remainder often receive polypharmacy, and current evidence suggests that perhaps only around 10% of these benefit significantly in terms of improved seizure control. Many more experience complicated drug interactions. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone (metabolized in part to phenobarbital) all induce the synthesis of hepatic monooxygenase and conjugating enzymes. This will result in an acceleration in the metabolism of other lipid-soluble drugs with likely attenuation of their pharmacological effects. Valproate, on the other hand, is a minor enzyme inhibitor. Pharmacokinetic interactions are almost invariable when more than one antiepileptic drug is coprescribed. The extent and direction of interactions with combinations of these drugs are varied and unpredictable. Discontinuation of an enzyme inducer or inhibitor will influence the concentrations of the remaining drug(s). Pharmacodynamic interactions also cause problems in epileptic patients. A number of commonly prescribed psychoactive drugs, such as tricyclic antidepressants and neuroleptics, can worsen seizure control by reducing the convulsion threshold. In addition, there seems little doubt that ethanol abuse and withdrawal can precipitate seizures in susceptible patients. Antiepileptic polypharmacy is more likely to impair cognitive function than the same drugs used singly. In addition, the more antiepileptic drugs received by a patient in the first trimester of pregnancy, the higher the risk of teratogenesis in the exposed infant. Drug interactions prolong and complicate the process of new drug assessment, particularly when introduced in treated patients with refractory epilepsy. The candidate antiepileptic drug may alter the concentration of concomitant therapy, or its own breakdown may be influenced by coprescribed enzyme inducers or inhibitors. Even if the new drug is excreted unchanged by the kidney, unexpected interactions can be uncovered. Pharmacodynamic interactions need not always be detrimental. Currently, there is no rational approach to the treatment of intractable epilepsy. As more new drugs with single mechanisms of action become available, the potential exists for combining these synergistically. This approach may revolutionize the pharmacological management of the epileptic patient in the 21st century.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Brodie. 1992. Drug interactions in epilepsy.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1992.tb05896.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.

Anticonvulsants↗