PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16456480

Knowledge-based quality management and clinical pathways.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although 65% of the hospitals in Taiwan claim to be applying the clinical pathway concept, most hospitals do not implement this concept effectively. The purpose of this study was to determine the reasons for the improper or inappropriate application of the clinical pathway design in hospitals. METHODS: This study differs from other studies in clinical pathway design and application in that it seeks to resolve misunderstandings of the clinical pathway analysis that may have been generated by the responses to survey questionnaires. Therefore, in-depth interviews and Senge's system archetype have been used to ascertain the reasons why the use of a clinical pathway design has been ineffective. We also used the 4 dimensions of knowledge-based management proposed by Drucker to set up the knowledge-based clinical pathway. Thirteen experts used the Delphi method to construct 20 knowledge-based clinical pathway guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The application of knowledge- and management-based clinical pathway designs is recommended.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chun-Lang Chang, Bor-Wen Cheng, Chih-Min Luo. Knowledge-based quality management and clinical pathways.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019514-200601000-00007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical management. Design for living.

91 per cent of patients started treatment within two mounths of referral, compared to 70-80 per cent last year. The last five months has seen rapid progress at a rate of 2 per cent a month. Sustaining improvement depends on leadership, measurement and looking at the whole patient pathway.

Critical Pathways↗

[Clinical pathways -- first results of a systematic IT-supported application at a surgical department of a university hospital].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In analogy to industrial process management, clinical pathways have been introduced for operational process organisation in orthopedic and interventional procedures as well as for conservative treatments. Within this study, introduction and continuous, systematic application of clinical pathways at a surgical department of a university hospital was investigated. METHODS: Analysis was performed by IT-based (SAP/i. s. h.med) evaluation of the registered data regarding pathway violations. Additionally, patients' records were matched with the computerized data for quality assurance of pathway documentation. RESULTS: 501 patients were entered in 16 clinical pathways (31 +/- 39 patients per pathway). The mean period from the introduction of a distinct pathway to the data acquisition of the present study ranged from 2 to 14 months (mean 7+/-7.5 months). Pathway violations correlated with the complexity, but not with the period since the pathway was introduced. Organisational reasons next to medical reasons (i. e. delayed gastric function or wound healing) were the most frequent causes for pathway violations. CONCLUSION: Clinical pathways may not only be realised for operative procedures or conservative treatments, but represent a clinical and administrative management instrument at a surgical department of a university hospital for daily work routine. They are suitable as an instrument for clinical quality and risk management, as an economic control instrument in reorganisation phases as well as in the routine of surgical clinics.

Critical Pathways↗