PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16461060

A video based training program improves defibrillator inspection compliance.

Bruce D Adams·Henry Shih·Elaine Stuffel·Alice M Robinson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Improperly maintained defibrillators are an important cause of defibrillation delay or failure during in-hospital cardiac arrest. This study investigated whether a brief training video of how to properly inspect crash carts and defibrillators would improve the quality and frequency of these inspections. The study was a before-after cohort design. Crash cart inspection logs were explicitly examined, and the electronic archive records of the defibrillators were interrogated. The compliance and quality of inspections were compared before and after the implementation of the training video program. The missed-inspection rate for defibrillators significantly improved from 8.9% to 6.9% (p= 0.037) after video training program implementation. The missed-inspection rate for crash carts, however, actually worsened from 2.7% before to 8.0% (p = 0.0001). The introduction of a new crash cart inspection training video program improved the frequency and quality of defibrillator inspections but not crash cart inspections. The inspection of crash carts and defibrillators is a vital hospital task. Because available training time for clinical personnel is limited, our 15-minute video can be viewed on a ward computer workstation at the most convenient time.

Explore related subjects

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationDefibrillatorsEquipment FailureHeart ArrestHumansVideo RecordingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bruce D Adams, Henry Shih, Elaine Stuffel, Alice M Robinson. 2006-01-04. A video based training program improves defibrillator inspection compliance.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.090

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Comparison of ventilation and chest compression performance by bystanders using the Impact Model 730 ventilator and a conventional bag valve with mask in a model of adult cardiopulmonary arrest.

"Bystanders" or lay persons are typically the first caregivers to attend to a victim of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Astronaut crew medical officers (CMO) play a similar role to bystanders aboard the International Space Station (ISS). Studies have demonstrated the importance of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) for patient survival before the arrival of emergency medical care. Recent apprehension from bystanders about the threat of contracting communicable diseases during BCPR, however, has led to the consideration of other ventilation systems such as the bag-valve mask (BVM) and automatic transport ventilators (ATV). BVM use is called for during CPR aboard the ISS. This study evaluated the ventilation and compression performance of 40 basic CPR-trained bystanders using either a BVM (adult-sized self-inflating bag with face mask) or an ATV (Model 730 ventilator (M730), Impact Instrumentation, Inc., West Caldwell, NJ). Each two-bystander team gave BCPR to a simulated cardiopulmonary arrest victim using the 2-breath/15-compression cycle for 4 min and then switched roles for another 4-min interval. Compared to BVM use, the M730 led to significantly (p<0.05) lower number of breaths, smaller tidal volumes, airway flows, airway pressures, volume of gas entering the stomach per breath and chest compressions for the 4-min period. The M730 also enabled a bystander to meet the recommendation of 4-breath and compression cycles per minute as per Guidelines 2000. Lastly, ease-of-use scores were significantly higher for the M730 compared to the BVM. Overall, the data suggest that the M730 improves the quality of performance for a bystander performing BCPR.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗