PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16473102

Back pain emergencies.

Michael E Winters·Paul Kluetz·Jeffrey Zilberstein
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Most adults in the United States will experience an episode of back pain at some point during their lifetime. Most will present to their primary care physician for evaluation and treatment. Many patients have non-life-threatening etiologies and recover within 4 to 6 weeks. A small percentage, however, have back pain due to a potentially life-threatening emergency. AD,rupturing AAA, SEM, cauda equina syndrome, vertebral osteomyelitis,and SEA are just some of the medical emergencies that can present with back pain. Clinical suspicion for these diagnoses begins with a thorough history and physical examination. It is imperative that the office-based physician search for and accurately identify any red flag within the history or physical examination. Appropriate laboratory studies and diagnostic imaging are obtained based on the suspected etiology.

Explore related subjects

Aortic DissectionAortic AneurysmAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBack PainEmergenciesEpidural AbscessHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOffice VisitsOsteomyelitisPhysical ExaminationPrimary Health CareRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificitySpinal Cord CompressionSpinal NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael E Winters, Paul Kluetz, Jeffrey Zilberstein. 2006. Back pain emergencies.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2005.11.002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Imaging of aortic abnormalities with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. A pictorial comparison with CT.

Aortic abnormalities are commonly encountered and may represent a diagnostic challenge in patients with acute or chronic clinical symptoms. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with low mechanical index (low MI) is a new promising method in the diagnosis and follow-up of pathological aortic lesions. CEUS with SonoVue allows a more rapid and noninvasive diagnosis, especially in critical patients because of its bedside availability. This review compares CEUS findings with those documented on computed tomography angiography (CTA), allowing the reader to appreciate the usefulness of CEUS in this clinical situation.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed2007

Risk of local adverse events by gender following cardiac catheterization.

PURPOSE: To assess the reason for the relative high risk of local complications for women following cardiac catheterization by evaluating the associations between gender, sheath size, and local adverse outcomes following cardiac catheterization. METHODS: The data used in this study were obtained from a portion of the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR), which included 13 878 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization at one of 59 participating cardiac catheterization institutions throughout the United States during late 2003. Rates of serious local vascular adverse events were calculated by gender following cardiac catheterization, by type of vascular hemostasis used, stratified by arterial sheath size. RESULTS: Serious local vascular events were reported in 3.54% of patients, most commonly hematoma (2.00%). The relative risk for women of any vascular complication was 1.40 [95%CI = 1.17, 1.67, p = 0.0002]. A statistically significant relative risk for woman was evident when collagen plug devices or manual compression alone were used as the first method for hemostasis. The rate of vascular complications increased progressively with increasing sheath size, more so in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS: High relative risk for women of local vascular complications following cardiac catheterization was demonstrated with use of manual compression, as well as with collagen plug devices to control femoral artery bleeding. Large sheath size is associated with both a relatively high absolute risk and a high relative risk for women. Knowledge of this information should be considered by interventional cardiologists in making decisions on how to achieve hemostasis following cardiac catheterization.

Aortic Dissection↗