PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16491567

[Basic neurography and its diagnostic importance].

Abstract

Nerve conduction studies are fundamental elements of the neurophysiological investigation of neuromuscular diseases. They provide information on peripheral nerve function. Knowledge of the biological and technical basis of the method is essential for the clinician to understand the place of nerve conduction testing in the diagnostic process. A characteristic feature of the nerve fibers is their ability to conduct electrical potentials. This conductivity changes in pathologic circumstances; therefore, the patient's nerve conduction data may be important if a neuromuscular disorder is suspected. The electrical activity spreading along the nerve fibres can be detected with special techniques and instruments. To perform an examination, a stimulator, a high quality amplifier and a computer with various accessories are necessary. The examination is usually carried out by surface stimulation and recording electrodes and requires some cooperation. By supramaximal stimuli all nerve fibers in the peripheral nerve are activated, and their summated activity is recorded bipolarly. For technical reasons the procedures for the motor and the sensory nerve conduction measurements are somewhat different, but their principles are similar. A number of parameters, such as the latency, the amplitude, the area and the shape of the evoked potentials are analyzed. These parameters are influenced by many biological (age, gender, body height, etc.), physical (such as limb temperature) and technical factors. The results are compared with the reference data. Nerve conduction studies may help distinguish between normal and diseased nerve function. The latter has two main categories; axonal lesion and demyelinisation. Axonal lesion is characterized by relatively normal conduction velocity and lower than normal amplitude of the potentials. Demyelinisation is almost the opposite with long latencies, slow conduction velocity and relatively spared potential amplitudes. Nerve conduction studies help differentiate between these two forms. Abnormalities found by nerve conduction measurement may reflect the severity of the disease. Repeated studies are suitable for quantitative follow-up. The anatomical, physiological, pathophysiological and technical details are discussed below. The characteristic neurographic findings of various diseases are also summarized.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gábor Kiss. 2005-11-20. [Basic neurography and its diagnostic importance].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16491567/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Modulation operated by the sympathetic nervous system on jaw reflexes and masticatory movement.

The sympathetic nervous system (SNS), that is activated under condition of physical, psychological and psychosocial stress, affects force production and fatigability of muscles by controlling both muscle blood flow and the intracellular contractile mechanism. In addition SNS may affect motor function by modulating afferent activity from muscle spindles that are highly concentrated in jaw-closing muscles. Possible implications of these actions on masticatory function and myofascial pain are discussed.

Electromyography↗

Abnormal responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in multiple system atrophy.

We studied the response of the motor cortex to brief trains of suprathreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations (rTMS) in patients with the Parkinson-variant of multiple system atrophy (MSA-P) and compared it to patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and healthy controls. Eight subjects were studied in each group, and patients were matched for disease severity as assessed by Hoehn & Yahr stages. rTMS was delivered at rest and during low-level contractions in trains of 10 stimulations at 5 Hz, and stimulation intensity was set to result in an motor evoked potential (MEP) in the first dorsal interosseus muscle of 0.5 to 1.0 mV. In MSA-P, MEP amplitude at rest was already reduced after the second stimulus and remained so, while it did not change in PD and controls. During contraction, MEP size did not change during the train in any group. The silent period that followed the last stimulus was of similar duration as the first stimulus in MSA-P, but was increased in PD and controls. These findings indicate that abnormal inhibition occurs within the motor cortex in MSA-P, despite dopaminergic treatment and indicate differences in cortical dysfunction between MSA-P and PD. We suggest that these abnormalities reflect the motor cortex pathology found in MSA-P.

Electromyography↗