PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16507528

Fundamental differences between the methods of maximum likelihood and maximum posterior probability in phylogenetics.

Bodil Svennblad·Per Erixon·Bengt Oxelman·Tom Britton
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Using a four-taxon example under a simple model of evolution, we show that the methods of maximum likelihood and maximum posterior probability (which is a Bayesian method of inference) may not arrive at the same optimal tree topology. Some patterns that are separately uninformative under the maximum likelihood method are separately informative under the Bayesian method. We also show that this difference has impact on the bootstrap frequencies and the posterior probabilities of topologies, which therefore are not necessarily approximately equal. Efron et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13429-13434, 1996) stated that bootstrap frequencies can, under certain circumstances, be interpreted as posterior probabilities. This is true only if one includes a non-informative prior distribution of the possible data patterns, and most often the prior distributions are instead specified in terms of topology and branch lengths. [Bayesian inference; maximum likelihood method; Phylogeny; support.].

Explore related subjects

Bayes TheoremBiological EvolutionClassificationComputational BiologyLikelihood FunctionsModels, BiologicalPhylogenyComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bodil Svennblad, Per Erixon, Bengt Oxelman, Tom Britton. 2006. Fundamental differences between the methods of maximum likelihood and maximum posterior probability in phylogenetics.. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150500481648

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

A Bayesian framework for multivariate differential analysis.

Differential analysis is a routine procedure in the statistical analysis toolbox across many applied fields, including quantitative proteomics, the main illustration of the present paper. The state-of-the-art limma approach uses a hierarchical formulation with moderated-variance estimators for each analyte directly injected into the t-statistic. While standard hypothesis testing strategies are recognised for their low computational cost, allowing for quick extraction of the most differential among thousands of elements, they generally overlook key aspects such as handling missing values, inter-element correlations, and uncertainty quantification. The present paper proposes a fully Bayesian framework for differential analysis, leveraging a conjugate hierarchical formulation for both the mean and the variance. Inference is performed by computing the posterior distribution of compared experimental conditions and sampling from the distribution of differences. This approach provides well-calibrated uncertainty quantification at a similar computational cost as hypothesis testing by leveraging closed-form equations. Furthermore, a natural extension enables multivariate differential analysis that accounts for possible inter-element correlations. We also demonstrate that, in this Bayesian treatment, missing at random data should generally be ignored in univariate settings, and further derive a tailored approximation that handles multiple imputation for the multivariate setting. We argue that probabilistic statements in terms of effect size and associated uncertainty are better suited to practical decision-making. Therefore, we finally propose simple and intuitive inference criteria, such as the overlap coefficient, which express group similarity as a probability rather than traditional, and often misleading, p-values. The performance of this approach is evaluated through an extensive empirical study using both synthetic and controlled real-world proteomics datasets. Overall, we believe that this Bayesian framework for (multivariate) differential analysis provides a valuable and intuitive counterpart to standard methods at a comparable computational cost.

Bayes Theorem↗
PubMed2026

NExON-Bayes: a Bayesian approach to network estimation informed by ordinal covariates.

MOTIVATION: In heterogeneous disease settings, accounting for intrinsic sample variability is crucial for obtaining reliable and interpretable omic network estimates. However, most graphical model analyses of biomedical data assume homogeneous conditional dependence structures, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. To address this, we propose a joint Gaussian graphical model that leverages sample-level ordinal covariates (e.g. disease stage) to account for heterogeneity and improve the estimation of partial correlation structures. RESULTS: Our modelling framework, called NExON-Bayes, extends the graphical spike-and-slab framework to account for ordinal covariates, jointly estimating their relevance to the graph structure and leveraging them to improve the accuracy of network estimation. To scale to high-dimensional omic settings, we develop an efficient variational inference algorithm tailored to our model. Through simulations, we demonstrate that our method outperforms the vanilla graphical spike-and-slab (with no covariate information), as well as other state-of-the-art network approaches which exploit covariate information. Applying our method to reverse phase protein array data from patients diagnosed with stage I, II or III breast carcinoma, we estimate the behaviour of proteomic networks as cancer progresses. Our model provides insights not only through inspection of the estimated proteomic networks, but also of the estimated ordinal covariate dependencies of key groups of proteins within those networks, offering a comprehensive understanding of how biological pathways shift across disease stages. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A user-friendly R package for NExON-Bayes with tutorials is available on Github at github.com/jf687/NExON, and archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20312938. The source of the dataset used is cited in the relevant section.

Bayes Theorem↗
PubMed2026

BaGGLS: a Bayesian shrinkage framework for interpretable modeling of interactions in high-dimensional biological data.

MOTIVATION: Biological data is often high dimensional, noisy, and governed by complex interactions among sparse signals. This poses major challenges for interpretability and reliable feature selection. Tasks such as identifying motif interactions in genomics exemplify these difficulties, as only a small subset of biologically relevant features (e.g. motifs) are typically active, and their effects are often non-linear and context-dependent. While statistical approaches often result in more interpretable models, deep learning models have proven effective in modeling complex interactions and prediction accuracy, yet their black-box nature limits interpretability. RESULTS: We introduce BaGGLS, a flexible and interpretable probabilistic binary regression model designed for high-dimensional biological inference involving feature interactions. BaGGLS incorporates a Bayesian group global-local shrinkage prior, aligned with the group structure introduced by interaction terms. This prior encourages sparsity while retaining interpretability, helping to isolate meaningful signals and suppress noise. To enable scalable inference, we employ a partially factorized variational approximation that captures posterior skewness and supports efficient learning even in large feature spaces. In extensive simulations, we compare BaGGLS to frequentist probit regressions (unconstrained and with L1-penalty) as well as a probit model with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling under a horseshoe prior. We can show that BaGGLS outperforms the other methods with regard to interaction detection and is many times faster than MCMC sampling under the horseshoe prior. We also demonstrate the usefulness of BaGGLS in the context of interaction discovery from motif scanner outputs (e.g. Find Individual Motif Occurrences (FIMO)) and noisy attribution scores from deep learning models. This shows that BaGGLS is a promising approach for uncovering biologically relevant interaction patterns, with potential applicability across a range of high-dimensional tasks in computational biology. AVAILABILITY: Code is available at gitlab.com/dacs-hpi/baggls.

Bayes Theorem↗