PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16513922

Guidelines for developing and testing clinical decision rules.

Abstract

Clinical decision rules (CDRs) are decision support tools that synthesize evidence for use in bedside practice. They differ from other decision support tools in the methodological rigor with which they are developed. This article describes the important considerations in developing a CDR, including identifying the need for the rule, carefully defining the outcome variable, identifying and selecting the possible predictor variables, and guidelines for initial testing of the CDR. The process of developing and testing CDRs is best undertaken by teams of researchers, with clinical nurses providing important input in both the development and testing. It's important that clinical nurses understand both the contributions of CDRs and their inherent limitations, as appropriate use of well-developed, well-validated CDRs will become more and more a necessity in evidence-based nursing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Susan E Shapiro. 2006. Guidelines for developing and testing clinical decision rules.. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945905283722

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Inter-professional relationship between primary health care (PHC) and secondary care (hospital) in 1992 and 2000. A Delphi study].

AIM: To evaluate the trends in the inter-professional relationship between primary health care (PHC) and secondary care (hospital) at 2 different moments of the health reform, at its start in 1992 and after a phase of consolidation (2001). DESIGN: Observational study based on modified Delphi technique. SETTING: Valencia Community, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and ninety six professionals from Valencia Community were selected (103 PH centre administrators, 43 hospital and PC medical directors, and 50 heads of internal medicine or emergency services). RESULTS: One hundred and ninety six questionnaires were sent out, with a response rate of 38%. In PHC problems remained the same, but the following got worse: "lack of motivation" (+1.34), "lack of overall vision of patients" (+1.10), and "overuse of medical services" (+1.06). The existence of non-integrated out-patient specialists got better (-1.32). In hospitals, "lack of overall vision of patients" got worse (+0.51), but in general problems got better, especially in "lack of communication and dialogue" (-1.14). PC increased its demand for "a single computerized clinical record" (+1.50), drawing up of common protocols (+0.86), and periodic rotations of PC doctors through hospitals (+0.85), but bureaucratic referrals to PC (-0.60) and the need for specialists in PC as consultants (-0.36) diminished. In hospitals all solutions showed lower scores, particularly access of PC doctors to monitoring of admitted patients (-2.44) and PC doctors doing hospital cover (-2.30). CONCLUSIONS: Problems and solutions from PHC and hospitals remain the same, but there is a trend to the worse in PHC, whereas in hospitals the trend is more positive.

Delphi Technique↗

Assessing the institutional effectiveness of state environmental agencies in Turkey.

Improving the performance of the state environmental agencies (SEAs) necessitates an effective institutionalization of governmental environmental management functions. There are examples of successful and unsuccessful SEAs in several parts of the world. Analysis and assessment of these cases can deliver useful insights for institution builders. The objective of this article is the assessment of the institutional effectiveness of the SEAs in Turkey through the perceptions of the experts using the Delphi Technique. In this regard, a checklist is developed including 16 criteria and 123 subcriteria to measure the institutional effectiveness of the SEAs. Twenty-eight national and international experts have formed a Delphi panel and evaluated the national and local conditions. Results, based on the perceptions of the experts, indicate that the overall effectiveness of the SEAs is far less than satisfactory. Negative consensus has been reached over the effectiveness of 13 of the 16 criteria and 95 of the 123 subcriteria; however, no consensus has been achieved over the remainder of the parameters. The survey has also proven that the Delphi Technique can be effectively used for that purpose. Utilization of the checklist method is also useful in diagnosing the problematic components of the SEAs. It is recommended that this approach be used in similar cases elsewhere.

Delphi Technique↗