PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16581257

Developing a VATS lobectomy programme--can VATS lobectomy be taught?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although VATS lobectomy has been demonstrated to be safe and effective, the technique is not widely practiced. This may, in part, reflect difficulty in acquiring appropriate skills. We have evaluated the effect of experience and training on surgical outcomes during the development and establishment of a VATS lobectomy programme. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 276 consecutive VATS lobectomies under the care of a single consultant as either the primary surgeon or supervising four trainees. The series was divided into cohorts of 46 patients. These comprised one trainee cohort and five sequential consultant cohorts. Statistical analysis utilised standard tests of significance. RESULTS: Increasing experience with the VATS lobectomy programme was associated with a significant reduction in operating time but intraoperative blood loss and postoperative stay were not influenced by increasing consultant surgical experience. Training was associated with a mean increase of 22 min operative time (p=0.0005) but no increase in intraoperative blood loss, morbidity, mortality or postoperative stay. The 46 trainee operative times were similar to the first 46 consultant cases. CONCLUSIONS: VATS lobectomy can be safely taught to trainee thoracic surgeons. However, in view of the limited number of centres undertaking VATS lobectomy, training should be coordinated at a national level to concentrate experience and improve uptake of this technique.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jonathan Ferguson, William Walker. 2006-04-11. Developing a VATS lobectomy programme--can VATS lobectomy be taught?. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.02.012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer death. A randomized study was performed on patients with localized prostate cancer and treated with radical prostatectomy using the perineal or the retropubic approach comparing oncological outcomes, cancer control, and functional results. STUDY DESIGN: Between 1997 and 2004, in a randomized study 200 patients underwent a radical prostatectomy performed by retropubic (100 patients) or perineal (100 patients) approach. RESULTS: Differences between hospital stay, duration of catheter drainage, intraoperative blood loss, and transfusion requirements were statistically significant in favor of perineal prostatectomy. Differences between positive surgical margins and urinary continence in the two groups were not statistically significant at 6 and 24 months. Differences between erectile function at 24 months were statistically significant in favor of retropubic prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Radical perineal prostatectomy is an excellent alternative approach for radical surgery in the treatment of early prostate cancer.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

Bipolar pulse coagulation for resection of the cirrhotic liver.

BACKGROUND: The major technical challenge of liver surgery is controlling bleeding during transection of the parenchyma. The Gyrus hand piece (GHP) is a bipolar diathermy pulsation instrument that is similar in design to a large hemostat (Péan) clamp that divides tissue while the clamp remains closed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the peri-operative data from 10 patients with early cirrhosis (stage 1-4) who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular cancer between February 2004 and July 2005. Five consecutive patients who underwent resection using the GHP were compared to five other patients who underwent resection using the traditional "crush clamp technique" (CCT). Six patients underwent minor hepatectomy (<3 segments) and four underwent major hepatectomy (>3 segments). RESULTS: When the GHP was used, the mean Pringle time was 13 +/- 5 min, mean blood loss was 520 mL +/- 118, and mean operative time was 252 +/- 15 min. When the CCT was used, the average Pringle time was 13 +/- 3 min, mean blood loss was 630 +/- 67 mL, and mean operative time was 312 +/- 29 min. There were 2 major complications in the GHP group and 3 in the CCT group. Major complications included transient hepatic failure (i.e., ascites/encephalopathy) and biloma formation. CONCLUSIONS: One patient from each group suffered a minor wound complication. The average hospital stay was 8 days (range, 6-9) for the GHP group, and 8 days (range, 7-10) for CCT group. The operative mortality rate was 0%. Our preliminary results demonstrate that GHP provides an excellent and safe alternative to CCT for dividing the liver parenchyma in cirrhotic patients.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗