PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16582089

Selection for sow longevity.

Abstract

Sow longevity plays an important role in economically efficient piglet production because sow longevity is related to the number of piglets produced during its productive lifetime; however, selection for sow longevity is not commonly practiced in any pig breeding program. There is relatively little scientific literature concerning the genetic parameters (genetic variation and genetic correlations) or methods available for breeding value estimation for effective selection for sow longevity. This paper summarizes the current knowledge about the genetics of sow longevity and discusses the available breeding value estimation methods for sow longevity traits. The studies in the literature clearly indicate that sow longevity is a complex trait, and even the definition of sow longevity is variable depending on the researcher and research objective. In general, the measures and analyses of sow longevity can be divided into 1) continuous traits (e.g., productive lifetime) analyzed with proportional hazard models; and 2) more simple binary traits such as stayability until some predetermined fixed parity. Most studies have concluded that sufficient genetic variation exists for effective selection on sow longevity, and heritability estimates have ranged between 0.02 and 0.25. Moreover, sow longevity has shown to be genetically associated with prolificacy and leg conformation traits. Variable results from previous research have led to a lack of consensus among swine breeders concerning the valid methodology of estimating breeding values for longevity traits. One can not deny the superiority of survival analysis in the modeling approach of longevity data; however, multiple-trait analyses are not possible using currently available survival analysis software. Less sophisticated approaches have the advantage of evaluating multiple traits simultaneously, and thus, can use the genetic associations between sow longevity and other traits. Additional research is needed to identify the most efficient selection methods for sow longevity. Future research needs to concentrate on multiple trait analysis of sow longevity traits. Moreover, because longevity is a fitness trait, the nonadditive genetic effects (e.g., dominance) may play important role in the inheritance of sow longevity. Currently, not a single estimate for dominance variance of sow longevity could be identified from the scientific literature.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Serenius, K J Stalder. 2006. Selection for sow longevity.. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.8413_supple166x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Detection of two porcine circovirus type 2 genotypic groups in United States swine herds.

In late 2005, sporadic cases of an acute onset disease of high mortality were observed in 10- to 16-week-old growing pigs among several swine herds of the United States. Tissues from the affected pigs in Kansas, Iowa, and North Carolina were examined, and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) was detected consistently among these tissues. Phylogenetically, PCV2 can be divided into two major genotypic groups, PCV2-group 1 and PCV2-group 2. Whereas PCV2-group 1 isolates were detected in all the diseased animals, only two of the diseased animals harbored PCV2-group 2 isolates. This observation is important because PCV2-group 1 isolates had never been reported in the United States before (GenBank as of May 16, 2006), and they are closely related to the PCV2-group 1 isolates that have been described in Europe and Asia, previously. Our analysis revealed that each genotypic group contains a distinct stretch of nucleotide or amino acid sequence that may serve as a signature motif for PCV2-group 1 or PCV2-group 2 isolates.

Animal Husbandry↗

Performance of gestating sows in bedded hoop barns and confinement stalls.

The effects of gestation housing systems on sow and litter performance were evaluated for 2.5 yr in southwest Iowa. Gestation housing system treatments were as follows: 1) individual gestation stalls in a mechanically ventilated confinement building with a partially slatted floor and a manure flush system and 2) group pens with individual feed stalls in deep-bedded, naturally ventilated hoop barns. In all, 957 litters from 353 sows were evaluated. Number of pigs born alive per litter differed for the 2 housing treatments (P = 0.002). Sows gestated in hoop barns gave birth to more live pigs per litter (10.0 +/- 0.2 pigs) than sows gestated in stalls (9.3 +/- 0.2 pigs). Preweaning mortality was not different for the 2 housing treatments (P = 0.70). Cross-fostering was done to equalize litter size within 24 h of birth, which resulted in an equal number of weaned pigs per sow (P = 0.50) regardless of gestation housing treatment. The weaning-to-breeding interval was different (P = 0.01), with sows kept in stalls (4.3 +/- 0.6 d) returning to estrus sooner than sows gestated in hoop barns (6.0 +/- 0.6 d). These results indicate that gestating sows can be housed as groups in deep-bedded hoop barns equipped with individual feeding stalls and will perform comparably to gestating sows housed in confinement systems with individual gestation stalls.

Animal Husbandry↗