PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16582834

Plaster cast or three-dimensional computer imaging: which is better?

Lee Zhanqiang·Jacob Golan·Wu Xiaoxia·Peng Qinjian·Wang Lichuan
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Casts, SurgicalHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPlastic Surgery ProceduresLetter

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lee Zhanqiang, Jacob Golan, Wu Xiaoxia, Peng Qinjian, Wang Lichuan. 2006. Plaster cast or three-dimensional computer imaging: which is better?. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000205581.47416.c9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Gap index: a good predictor of failure of plaster cast in distal third radius fractures.

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of the cast index and an indigenously developed gap index as measures of poor moulding of plaster. Twenty cases of re-manipulation of distal third radius fractures in children excluding growth plate injuries were compared with a control of 80 patients. A significant difference (<0.001) was observed in the cast index and the gap index of both the groups. The gap index was more sensitive than the cast index in predicting failure. At a level of cast index of more than 0.8 the relative risk of failure is 6.8 as compared with 35 when the sum of the gap index is more than 0.15. The gap index is a better predictor of failure than the cast index. A quick assessment of these indices is a good practice before accepting any plaster following a manipulation of distal radial fractures.

Casts, Surgical↗