PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16595426

Estimating injury severity using the Barell matrix.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Barell matrix (Inj Prev 2002;8:91-6) could effectively categorize injuries by severity. METHODS: Injury diagnoses of cases in the 2002 US Nationwide Inpatient Sample were classified according to the Barell matrix. For each cell of the matrix, the authors used ICDMAP-90 to determine the predominant Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) and body region, and calculated the weighted proportion surviving (bPScell) among patients with any diagnosis in that cell. These findings were used to estimate maximum AIS (bAISmax), ISS (bISS), and the minimum or product of bPScell (bPSmin, bPSprod) for injured patients in the 1996-2000 US National Hospital Discharge Surveys. Case survival was determined for different scores, and outcome models using age, sex, comorbidity, mechanism, and bISS or bPSmin were compared to models using ISS calculated from ICDMAP-90 (mISS) or using ICISS. RESULTS: Case survival decreased with increasing bAISmax or bISS; survival was closely approximated by bPSmin, and also increased monotonically with bPSprod. Outcome models using bISS or bPSmin were similar to those using mISS or ICISS. An Abbreviated Barell Categorization, with only four groups, was also effective. CONCLUSION: Barell matrix categorization of administrative data allows severity scoring similar to that obtainable with ICDMAP-90 or ICISS.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D E Clark, S Ahmad. 2006. Estimating injury severity using the Barell matrix.. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2005.010058

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Impact of simple interventions on neonatal mortality in a low-resource teaching hospital in India.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate impact of simple interventions on neonatal mortality in a low-resource teaching hospital in India. STUDY DESIGN: Before-and-after intervention trial setting: limited resource teaching hospital; DESIGN: Before and after study. INTERVENTIONS: A package of simple interventions was evolved. The interventions included: rational admissions and early discharge, entrusting mothers in care-giving, enforcing asepsis routines, aggressive enteral feeding, abandoning unnecessary interventions, protocol-based management, rational antibiotics and training and empowerment of nurses. STATISTICAL METHODS: The categorical and continuous variables were compared with chi (2) and two-tailed tests, respectively. RESULTS: Neonatal mortality rate declined significantly during the intervention period as compared to control period (20.3 versus 29.3 per 1000 live births; relative risk 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.85). Most significant decline occurred in sepsis-related deaths. The survival of neonates with birth weight 1000 to 1499 improved over two folds (56.7% versus 24.5%, P<0.01). There was a significant decline in antibiotics use (635/878, 72.3% versus 299/897, 23.2%; P=0.00). The duration of stay in neonatal unit was decreased by a mean of 1.5 day (95% CI 0.9 to 2.8 days) after interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Simple interventions can result in a significant decline in neonatal mortality in hospitals with limited resources. This package is likely to be effective in hospitals with a high proportion of the sepsis deaths.

Hospital Mortality↗