PubMed · 16602553
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
2006. A call for better reprocessing instructions.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16602553/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The objective of this study was to determine patients' perception on the possibility of changing a tradition-based practice to a more patient-empowering service, thus demonstrating that nurses can make a difference in providing a more patient-centred environment. The study revealed that the patients themselves wanted to be included in the decision-making process and actively embrace change.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
UNLABELLED: Allocation of operating room (OR) block time is an ongoing challenge for OR managers. In this study, we sought to determine whether inclusion or exclusion of turnover time in comparisons of block utilization would identify different surgical services as under- or overused. For a 13-mo period, we evaluated data extracted from the OR information system of a large academic medical center. During that time period, 15 surgical services performed 12,245 surgical procedures. Allocated block hours, number of first cases performed, total number of cases, and average case durations were determined. The average turnover time for each service was determined by a manual, case-by-case review of data from 1 mo. Raw utilization (RU; case durations only) and adjusted utilization (AU; case duration plus turnover time) were calculated for each service. Turnover time was credited to the service performing surgery after room turnover. Case du-ration was limited to surgeries performed during resource hours. Two indices of utilization (i.e., the usage rate of the service divided by the overall use of all ORs in the suite) were used to compare services: the RU or AU Index (RUI or AUI). Outliers were services with indices that were >1.15 or <0.85. The RUI identified three services as underutilizers and one service as an overutilizer. Using the AUI, the same outliers were identified, and no new services were identified. Examining the changes in index (between AUI and RUI), the percentage of to-follow cases highly correlated with changes in index (r(2) = 0.60); the average turnover time did not (r(2) = 0.002). Inclusion of turnover time did not change the services that were identified as under- and overutilizer. IMPLICATIONS: Turnover time is difficult to determine from existing operating room information systems. This study determined the use of block time with and without turnover time for each surgical service in a large academic hospital. Turnover time did not change identification of surgical services that over- (one service) or underused (three services) allocated block time.