PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16603013

Hypokalaemia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the metabolism and function of potassium and causes and management of hypokalaemia. DATA SOURCES: A review of studies reported from 1966 to 1998 and identified through a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature of hypokalaemia. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Potassium is predominantly an intracellular ion that contributes to approximately 50% of the intracellular fluid osmolality and is largely responsible for the resting membrane potential. The latter accounts for its influence on the excitability of muscle and nervous tissue. Hypokalaemia is defined as a serum potassium of less than 3.5 mmol/L or plasma potassium less than 3.0 mmol/L and may be asymptomatic. Clinical features associated with hypokalaemia include abnormalities of cardiovascular, neurological and metabolic function and may be treated with oral potassium salts, although tachycardia and muscle weakness are the two life threatening disorders which may require rapid intravenous correction. The potassium salts of chloride, phosphate and acetate are often used, although the choice is often guided by the presence of an associated hypochloraemic alkalosis, non-anion gap acidosis or hypophosphataemia, indicating treatment with potassium chloride, potassium acetate, or potassium phosphate, respectively. The infusion rates of intravenous therapy depends upon the salt used. Potassium chloride is usually infused at a rate up to 40 mmol/h, whereas potassium acetate and potassium monohydrogen or dihydrogen phosphate are usually infused up to 5 mmol/h and 2 mmol/h respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hypokalaemia can be asymptomatic or it may cause cardiovascular, neurological or skeletal muscle dysfunction. If intravenous potassium therapy is required, then correction with potassium chloride, acetate, or phosphate salts are usually guided by the presence of a metabolic acidosis, alkalosis or hypophosphataemia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Glover. 1999. Hypokalaemia.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16603013/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗