PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16613286

[Symptomatic surgery].

Abstract

We can distinguish between symptomatic and aetiological surgery. Symptomatic surgery includes operations, which remove the symptoms of a disease or at least palliate them albeit without removing their underlying pathology. On the other hand aetiological surgery means the curative removal of a pathology. It can be argued that any type of a surgery is symptomatic in nature, but that a part of the symptomatic surgery is curative as well. In addition to symptomatic and curative surgery, we also apply prophylactic surgery. Prophylactic surgery constitutes a controverse chapter. The question is whether an indication for prophylactic surgery does exist. One can argue, that it is difficult to improve the life of a well being patient by operating on him. On the other hand the question is whether it would not be more intelligent to improve the condition of a patient by removing the pathological aspects before symptoms appear. In addition, a pathological situation should not be allowed to progress to the stage where neither surgery nor conservative treatment offer sufficient benefit to patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A K Huber. 2006. [Symptomatic surgery].. https://doi.org/10.1024/0040-5930.63.3.174

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Revival of the side-to-side approach for distal coronary anastomosis.

Side-to-side anastomosis was employed by just ten proportional stitches while performing distal anastomosis during coronary artery surgery. This technique is simple and quick. Here this simple technique is described in detail and the postoperative status of grafted conduits is reported.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

Review article: Indeterminate colitis--definition, diagnosis and management.

BACKGROUND: The term indeterminate colitis is imprecise and without a generally accepted definition. Nevertheless, it is a term that is commonly used by gastroenterologists, pathologists and surgeons. AIM: To offer an opinion supported by published data, about the appropriate use of the term indeterminate colitis by addressing a series of questions. METHODS: A PubMed database search was performed using the keywords, 'colitis' and 'inflammatory bowel disease' each combined individually with the following adjectives: 'indeterminate', 'unclassified', 'undefined', 'undiagnosed' and 'non-specific'. RESULTS: There is no generally accepted definition of indeterminate colitis. All current applications of the term rely on exclusionary criteria and there is no confirmatory diagnostic test. Nevertheless, the diagnosis of indeterminate colitis appears to be durable in a subgroup of patients, suggesting that this group represents a unique phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Indeterminate colitis has expanded from a strictly defined, postcolectomy pathological diagnosis to become, in addition, a clinical diagnosis without generally accepted criteria. A diagnosis of indeterminate colitis should be qualified with descriptors for the diagnostic criteria applied.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

Acellular dermal matrix grafts for prevention of microarterial thrombophlebitis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of acellular dermal matrix grafts for prevention of microarterial anastomotic thrombophlebitis. DESIGN: Bilateral femoral artery microvascular anastomoses were created in the field of established wounds infected with Staphylococcus aureus in 12 rats. In each animal, 1 femoral microarterial anastomosis was wrapped with an acellular dermal matrix graft, and the contralateral femoral anastomosis was left unprotected. The incidence of femoral artery thrombosis was determined after 4 days by wound reexploration. SETTING: David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The patency of femoral artery anastomoses was determined after 4 days by wound reexploration. RESULTS: The incidence of femoral artery thrombosis in vessels wrapped with acellular dermal matrix grafts was 17%. The incidence of femoral artery thrombosis in unprotected vessels was 100%. This difference was statistically significant (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Acellular dermal matrix grafts seem to have a protective effect in the prevention of acute thrombophlebitis when arterial microvascular anastomoses are performed in infected surgical fields.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗