PubMed · 16619405
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Catherine Jackson. 2006. Working well.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16619405/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Bimodal distributions of counts with one mode at zero are often seen in medical research. In a health survey parents were asked the number of days their children missed their activities (Y(1)) and the number of days their children spent in bed (Y(2)) due to illness in the past four weeks. Both variables exhibited zero inflation. We consider a bivariate Poisson-Poisson regression model, in which the two variables are regarded as indicators of an unobserved health status variable. Based on this, we further develop a bivariate Poisson-Poisson model that constrains Y(1)>or=Y(2). It is often claimed that there is a critical window of growth and nutrition in foetal life and infancy during which subsequent health status is affected. It is not clear whether the claim is true and whether childhood growth matters more. We analyse the bivariate data in relation to weight-for-age in infancy and weight gain from infancy to age 7 years. The findings do not support the existence of a critical window in infancy. There is some indication that childhood weight gain might affect health status.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: From 1996 to 2003, the total number of sickness absence days increased by 65% in Norway. AIM: To investigate if this could be explained by a corresponding increase in the prevalence of self-reported health complaints in the same period. METHODS: Representative samples of the Norwegian working population in 1996 (n = 838) and 2003 (n = 637) answered the subjective health complaints (SHC) questionnaire. The single items of the SHC questionnaire were matched with the corresponding sickness absence statistics from the National Insurance Administration in 1996 and 2003. RESULTS: The main finding was a poor concordance between the change in prevalence of health complaints and the change in the prevalence of sickness absence for diagnoses corresponding to these complaints. The prevalence of health complaints in Norway was high and relatively stable from 1996 to 2003. The only complaints that increased in prevalence during the period were allergy and severe asthma. Sickness absence for health complaints, however, showed a general increase. The diagnoses with the largest percentage increase in sickness absence were sleep problems, tiredness, anxiety and palpitation, although the absolute number of individuals with sickness absence for these complaints was small. CONCLUSIONS: The increased sickness absence in Norway from 1996 to 2003 cannot be explained by an increase in health complaints in the general population in the same period. The increase in sickness absence is most likely to be explained by multifactorial causes, such as changes in working life and health expectations.