PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16631463

Future innovations in treating advanced prostate cancer.

Abstract

Many novel techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer are being aggressively investigated because prostate cancer is prevalent in the population and the current treatments for advanced prostate cancer are woefully inadequate. Although the current treatment options prolong life, most patients will eventually experience local recurrence or develop advanced disease. A greater understanding of the molecular events underlying cancer has enabled investigators to explore gene therapy approaches that are targeted against these molecular events. This article discusses antiangiogenic therapy, immune based therapy, and gene therapy. Any of these experimental modalities could be developed to replace hormone ablation therapy which causes unpleasant side effects, decreases the quality of life of the patient, and only temporarily controls the disease.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pratik Desai, Juan A Jiménez, Chinghai Kao, Thomas A Gardner. 2006. Future innovations in treating advanced prostate cancer.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2005.12.005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The immunosuppressant FTY720 inhibits tumor angiogenesis via the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1.

FTY720, a sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) analog, acts as an immunosuppressant through trapping of T cells in secondary lymphoid tissues. FTY720 was also shown to prevent tumor growth and to inhibit vascular permeability. The MTT proliferation assay illustrated that endothelial cells are more susceptible to the anti-proliferative effect of FTY720 than Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC1) cells. In a spheroid angiogenesis model, FTY720 potently inhibited the sprouting activity of VEGF-A-stimulated endothelial cells even at concentrations that apparently had no anti-proliferative effect. Mechanistically, the anti-angiogenic effect of the general S1P receptor agonist FTY720 was mimicked by the specific S1P1 receptor agonist SEW2871. Moreover, the anti-angiogenic effect of FTY720 was abrogated in the presence of CXCR4-neutralizing antibodies. This indicates that the effect was at least in part mediated by the S1P1 receptor and involved transactivation of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor. Additionally, we could illustrate in a coculture spheroid model, employing endothelial and smooth muscle cells (SMCs), that the latter confer a strong protective effect regarding the action of FTY720 upon the endothelial cells. In a subcutaneous LLC1 tumor model, the anti-angiogenic capacity translated into a reduced tumor size in syngeneic C57BL/6 mice. Consistently, in the Matrigel plug in vivo assay, 10 mg/kg/d FTY720 resulted in a strong inhibition of angiogenesis as demonstrated by a reduced capillary density. Thus, in organ transplant patients, FTY720 may prove efficacious in preventing graft rejection as well as tumor development.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗