PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16632624

Optical density variations in CT films and their effect on image quality.

Abstract

It was recently reported that optical density (OD) variations were observed in CT films printed with a laser camera, depending on the printing format and the frame position within the film. The purpose of the present study was to investigate if these variations are common to both laser and dry-film printers and if the different OD settings along with day-to-day and frame-to-frame variations may affect the image quality. Eight laser and five dry-film printers installed at 12 different CT facilities were tested. For each one, the SMPTE test pattern was printed on all frames of a film using the same printing format. The ODs of the 0%, 10%, 40% and 70% patches of the 11-step greyscale of the SMPTE patterns were measured with a densitometer in all frames, while all films were examined on a viewing box to assess subjectively the image quality by visual inspection of the test pattern. A wide range of OD settings and variations were recorded. Frame-to-frame variations in the same film of up to 0.19, 0.15 and 0.21 OD, were observed for contrast index (CI, the OD difference of patches 10% and 70%), speed index (SI, the OD of patch 40%) and maximum OD (OD(max), the OD of patch 0%), respectively. The variations were not always of the same magnitude, nor always followed the same pattern, even for printers of the same model. Considering all films and frames, the CI ranged from 1.26 to 1.74, the SI from 0.68 to 1.43 and the OD(max) from 2.5 to 3.11 OD, well beyond the proposed settings and tolerances of 1.55+/-0.15, 1.15+/-0.1 and 2.45+/-0.1 given in the literature for CI, SI and OD(max), respectively. Despite these large differences, the various problems that were identified in image quality from the visual inspection of the films could not be directly attributed to OD settings, as films with similar CI, SI and OD(max) presented quite different image quality levels. Therefore, for routine quality control, thorough visual inspection of the SMPTE test pattern provides all the necessary information about the imaging chain status.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I A Tsalafoutas, G V Papoutsis, P N Maniatis, K A Gogos. 2006. Optical density variations in CT films and their effect on image quality.. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr%2F28579947

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The pursuit theory of motion parallax.

Although motion parallax is closely associated with observer head movement, the underlying neural mechanism appears to rely on a pursuit-like eye movement signal to disambiguate perceived depth sign from the ambiguous retinal motion information [Naji, J. J., & Freeman, T. C. A. (2004). Perceiving depth order during pursuit eye movement. Vision Research, 44, 3025-3034; Nawrot, M. (2003). Eye movements provide the extra-retinal signal required for the perception of depth from motion parallax. Vision Research, 43, 1553-1562]. Here, we outline the evidence for a pursuit signal in motion parallax and propose a simple neural network model for how the pursuit theory of motion parallax might function within the visual system. The first experiment demonstrates the crucial role that an extra-retinal pursuit signal plays in the unambiguous perception of depth from motion parallax. The second experiment demonstrates that identical head movements can generate opposite depth percepts, and even ambiguous percepts, when the pursuit signal is altered. The pursuit theory of motion parallax provides a parsimonious explanation for all of these observations.

Computer Peripherals↗

Ubiquitous computing to support co-located clinical teams: using the semiotics of physical objects in system design.

OBJECTIVES: Co-located teams often use material objects to communicate messages in collaboration. Modern desktop computing systems with abstract graphical user interface (GUIs) fail to support this material dimension of inter-personal communication. The aim of this study is to investigate how tangible user interfaces can be used in computer systems to better support collaborative routines among co-located clinical teams. METHODS: The semiotics of physical objects used in team collaboration was analyzed from data collected during 1 month of observations at an emergency room. The resulting set of communication patterns was used as a framework when designing an experimental system. Following the principles of augmented reality, physical objects were mapped into a physical user interface with the goal of maintaining the symbolic value of those objects. RESULTS: NOSTOS is an experimental ubiquitous computing environment that takes advantage of interaction devices integrated into the traditional clinical environment, including digital pens, walk-up displays, and a digital desk. The design uses familiar workplace tools to function as user interfaces to the computer in order to exploit established cognitive and collaborative routines. CONCLUSION: Paper-based tangible user interfaces and digital desks are promising technologies for co-located clinical teams. A key issue that needs to be solved before employing such solutions in practice is associated with limited feedback from the passive paper interfaces.

Computer Peripherals↗

Visual assessment of angular response in medical liquid crystal displays.

In spite of having non-Lambertian emission, displays based on liquid crystal technology are becoming popular for medical diagnostic work stations. For all liquid crystal displays (LCDs), the contrast performance varies with viewing direction. Accurate measurements of the angular distribution of light emission require expensive instrumentation and extensive expertise. We investigated the possibility of using a test pattern to visually assess the angular response performance of LCDs. We found that this procedure offers the end user of displays a simple, fast, and relatively consistent technique to verify that the viewing angle performance of the display device is within certain acceptable limits.

Computer Peripherals↗