PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16646932

Journaling; an active learning technique.

Tim K Blake
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Journaling is a method frequently discussed in nursing literature and educational literature as an active learning technique that is meant to enhance reflective practice. Reflective practice is a means of self-examination that involves looking back over what has happened in practice in an effort to improve, or encourage professional growth. Some of the benefits of reflective practice include discovering meaning, making connections between experiences and the classroom, instilling values of the profession, gaining the perspective of others, reflection on professional roles, and development of critical thinking. A review of theory and research is discussed, as well as suggestions for implementation of journaling into coursework.

Explore related subjects

Data CollectionEducation, NursingHumansInterpersonal RelationsThinkingWritingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tim K Blake. 2005-04-15. Journaling; an active learning technique.. https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923x.1116

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

It might be premature to reject the assumption of a power curve relationship between VAS and SG data: three comments on Stevens, McCabe and Brazier's 'Mapping between VAS and SG data; results from the UK HUI Index 2 valuation survey'.

In a recent paper in Health Economics, Stevens, McCabe and Brazier (Health Econ. 2006; 15: 527-533.) found that the cubic relationship between Visual Analog Scale (VAS) values and standard gamble (SG) utilities was superior to other functional forms in terms of explanatory power and predictive ability. Consequently, they question the reliance on the assumption of a power curve relationship, which was established, theoretically and empirically, in earlier works. This note argues that: (1) SMB's conclusions are incorrect. The estimated cubic function overfits the four data points, and is questionable with respect to the implied attitude toward relative risk. (2) The evaluation of the functional forms in terms of the individual predictions' mean absolute error is misleading and (3) correcting for heteroscedasticity improves the precision of the estimates and of the predictions.

Data Collection↗
PubMed2007

A review of organizational culture instruments for nurse executives.

Nurse executives are aware of the complexities of organizational culture. It impacts the nursing work environment and patient care safety and quality. The authors describe several widely available tools that nurse leaders can use to assess organizational culture in the work environment. The psychometric and conceptual strengths and weaknesses of the measures are described and recommendations for use in nursing and patient care administration are provided.

Data Collection↗