PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16674332

Incontinence drug utilization patterns in Québec, Canada.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess prescription renewal and switch rates in an elderly population receiving oxybutynin or flavoxate for treatment of urinary incontinence in Quebec. METHODS: Sociodemographic, clinical, and drug claim data for patients > or = 65 years of age, with at least one claim for oxybutynin or flavoxate between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 1997, were randomly extracted from a database maintained by the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ). Rates of renewal of the first drug claim and the number of patients switching from one incontinence drug to the other were determined. In addition, survival curves defining the time until cessation of initial treatment were constructed. RESULTS: The oxybutynin (n = 5718) and flavoxate (n = 972) treatment groups were similar in terms of gender (62.1% female) and age (mean age 77). For oxybutynin, 56.8% of the claims were written by general practitioners and 36.6% by urologists compared to 40.5% by general practitioners and 51.4% by urologists for flavoxate. Only 39.3% of the oxybutynin patients renewed their first claims, compared to 36.6% of the flavoxate group. Switch rates were higher for flavoxate patients with more than twice as many patients switching from this drug to oxybutynin than vice versa. Survival curves indicated that there was only an 11.4% probability of a patient taking oxybutynin for 6 months compared to 5.7% for flavoxate patients. CONCLUSIONS: Drug claim renewal rates were low for both oxybutynin and flavoxate, suggesting that money spent on these therapies provides an inadequate clinical return on investment since the majority of patients discontinue treatment prematurely.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Desgagné, J LeLorier. Incontinence drug utilization patterns in Québec, Canada.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4733.1999.26005.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗