PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16699661

[MALKS: specifications and development].

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics of a new artificial anterior chamber (MALKS, Loktal, São Paulo, Brazil). METHODS: Characteristics analysis and description of a new artificial anterior chamber MALKS (Micro automated lamellar keratoplasty system). RESULTS: MALKS is composed of eight parts: a) artificial chamber; b) cornea's fix ring; c) nut to join the cornea's fix ring; d) rail and adjuster of lamellar diameter; e) flatteners, to pre-determine lamellar diameter; f) infusion system, that allows the digital objective peroperative control of the intracameral pressure; g) automated microkeratome, and h) marker. CONCLUSION: MALKS uses the same automated microkeratome developed for LASIK, can allow corneal lamella obtention with predetermined thickness and diameter, as well as the digital objective peroperative control of the intracameral pressure. This new artificial anterior chamber can be an important tool for superficial and endothelial keratoplasty.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gustavo Victor, Sidney Julio de Faria e Sousa, Milton Ruiz Alves, Walton Nosé. 2006-05-08. [MALKS: specifications and development].. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-27492006000200003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements.

PURPOSE: To compare measurements of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and corneal curvature obtained with the Pentacam to other commonly used devices. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. METHODS: Measurements of ACD and keratometry were prospectively obtained in 22 eyes of 11 subjects with the Pentacam compared with measurements of the ultrasound (US) A-scan and IOLMaster (ACD), and with those of automated keratometry (AK) and IOLMaster (keratometry) at the Assaf Harofeh Medical Center. RESULTS: The mean interdevice differences in keratometry for Pentacam vs AK, Pentacam vs IOLMaster, and AK vs IOLMaster were -0.046 diopters, -0.471 diopters, and -0.424 diopters, respectively. Measurements of keratometry by the IOLMaster differed statistically significantly from those of Pentacam (P < .01) and AK (P < .01). For measurement of keratometry, 95% limits of agreement were -1.321 to 1.229 diopters for the Pentacam and AK, -1.478 to 0.536 diopters for the Pentacam and IOLMaster, and -1.026 to 0.178 diopters for the AK and IOLMaster. The mean interdevice differences in ACD for the Pentacam vs US, Pentacam vs IOLMaster, and US vs IOLMaster were 0.103, 0.099, and -0.004 mm, respectively. Measurements of ACD by the Pentacam differed statistically significantly from those of US (P < .05) and IOLMaster (P < .01). For measurement of ACD, 95% limits of agreement were -0.197 to 0.404 mm for the Pentacam and US, -0.169 to 0.367 mm for the Pentacam and IOLMaster, and -0.332 to 0.324 mm for the US and IOLMaster. CONCLUSIONS: For some clinical applications, measurements of ACD and corneal curvature with the tested machines may differ greatly and therefore may not be interchangeable.

Anterior Chamber↗