PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16699761

[Clinical pathways: experiences, expectations, and perspectives].

Abstract

Due to economic necessities, existing reserves in clinical practice have to be used efficiently. The presentation of medical activity and systematic illustration of medical decisions in the form of clinical pathways constitute important tools to ensure the quality of patient care under fiscal pressure caused by the DRG system. To successfully establish clinical pathways, the architecture of the standard operating procedures developed specifically for a hospital must adequately reflect medical concerns and patient-related needs. The concept of necessity for the good of the patient applies in this instance rather than the principle of the complete depiction of all medical processes. Organizing the implementation into clinical practice should be assured and monitored. The standard operating procedures should be regularly adapted to suit medical developments. Success with the procedure should be reported and deviations from predetermined targets should be documented. A clinical pathway does not represent an administrative end in itself but rather a part of a higher control system that helps to improve the utilisation of the hospital's resources in terms of reliability and quality of patient care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Lohfert, P Kalmár. 2006. [Clinical pathways: experiences, expectations, and perspectives].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-006-1642-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗