PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16722959

Methodological issues in evaluating complex healthcare interventions.

Abstract

AIM: This paper outlines the difficulties in defining and evaluating a complex intervention and a number of currently available models for assisting this process are discussed. BACKGROUND: Interventions aimed at producing change in the delivery and organization of healthcare services require rigorous evaluation to demonstrate their effectiveness. Evaluation poses difficulties, however, because these interventions are usually very complex. METHODS: A framework developed by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council to evaluate complex interventions is described. The use of this framework in designing and evaluating a nurse-led intervention in intensive care for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation is discussed. Semi-structured interviews, a questionnaire survey and observational work were undertaken to define the components of the intervention, which was subsequently evaluated in an exploratory trial using a quasi-experimental design. CONCLUSION: The framework was a useful tool and can be easily applied in developing and evaluating complex nursing interventions. Three key challenges emerge from this experience: (i) relevant research evidence should be used systematically in developing the components of the intervention, (ii) the definition and measurement of complex intervention outcomes needs to be improved and (iii) appropriate research designs must be used when evaluating complex interventions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bronagh Blackwood. 2006. Methodological issues in evaluating complex healthcare interventions.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03869.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Acute and transient psychotic disorders (ICD-10: F23). Empirical data and implications for therapy].

The defining clinical features of acute and transient psychotic disorders (ICD-10: F23) are an acute onset and a duration of psychotic symptoms not exceeding 1-3 months. Previous empirical investigations show that patients with this diagnosis have a favourable prognosis, but also a high risk of relapses (58-77%). The diagnostic stability in the further course of illness seems to be low (34-73%) with a frequent diagnostic change to schizophrenia and affective disorders being observed. As yet, data from controlled clinical trials regarding therapy do not exist. The implications for the treatment of acute and transient psychotic disorders are discussed with this background.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗