PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16729851

Evidence-based policy-making.

Abstract

There is no large literature on evidence-based policy-making. We do know that one of the most difficult decisions is about the dependability of evidence we use to make policy. Unless the evidence can fulfil the criteria of quality, validity, and size, then it has the potential to mislead us, whatever study designs or methods have been used. The best examples of evidence-based policy-making come from development of care pathways, in which multidisciplinary groups merge best-available evidence with what is possible in local circumstances. These care pathways almost always have the ability to deliver better care for patients, with less fuss for professionals and at lower cost to the community. They may be the single best way of improving healthcare.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Andrew Moore. 2006. Evidence-based policy-making.. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2006.122

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Acute and transient psychotic disorders (ICD-10: F23). Empirical data and implications for therapy].

The defining clinical features of acute and transient psychotic disorders (ICD-10: F23) are an acute onset and a duration of psychotic symptoms not exceeding 1-3 months. Previous empirical investigations show that patients with this diagnosis have a favourable prognosis, but also a high risk of relapses (58-77%). The diagnostic stability in the further course of illness seems to be low (34-73%) with a frequent diagnostic change to schizophrenia and affective disorders being observed. As yet, data from controlled clinical trials regarding therapy do not exist. The implications for the treatment of acute and transient psychotic disorders are discussed with this background.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗