PubMed · 16750185
Cognitive architecture and descent with modification.
Abstract
Against a background of recent progress in developmental neuroscience, some of which has been taken as challenging to the modularity hypothesis of , this article contrasts two competing conceptions of modularity: sui generis modularity, according to which modules are treated as independent neurocognitive entities that owe nothing to one another, and descent-with-modification modularity, according to which current cognitive modules are understood to be shaped by evolutionary changes from ancestral cognitive modules. I argue that sui generis modularity is incompatible with a range of data, from the co-occurrence of deficits to the patterns of activation in neuroimaging studies, but that same range of data is compatible with descent-with-modification modularity. Furthermore, I argue that the latter conception of modularity may have important implications for the practice and conception of fields such as developmental disorders and linguistics.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Gary F Marcus. 2006-06-05. Cognitive architecture and descent with modification.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.009
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.