PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16759630

Safety communications: warnings.

Abstract

This paper has two objectives: to identify and review factors that research has shown to be most significant in determining the effectiveness of warnings; and, to offer suggestions regarding challenges and opportunities for future research on warnings. In order for warnings to be effective, they must accomplish two objectives: they must be noticed and encoded; and they must provide understandable information needed for recipients to make informed decisions regarding compliance. A number of variables or factors have emerged as being especially significant in determining whether or not a warning achieves these objectives. These factors include both warning system design variables as well as characteristics of the target audience and the situation in which the warning is presented. While there has been significant progress in understanding the factors that influence warning effectiveness, there are also remaining challenges and opportunities. Challenges include issues associated with growing international trade such as language barriers, literacy and cultural values. Innovative approaches and opportunities are offered by developing communication technologies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kenneth R Laughery. 2006-06-06. Safety communications: warnings.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.020

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Indicators for occupational health surveillance.

Each year, millions of the estimated 140 million U.S. workers are injured on the job or become ill from exposure to hazards at work. These work-related injuries and illnesses result in substantial human and economic costs for workers, employers, and society; estimated direct and indirect costs of work-related injuries and illnesses are approximately $170 billion annually. In 1998, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) convened a work group that identified priority occupational health conditions to be placed under surveillance, addressed cross-cutting surveillance concerns, and made recommendations regarding the role of states in a comprehensive nationwide surveillance system for work-related disease, injuries, and hazards. CSTE recommendations led to the generation of 19 occupational health indicators (OHIs) and one Employment Demographic Profile, which were developed during 2001-2003. The OHIs complement other guidelines for state-based occupational health surveillance to address overall state and national goals to improve public health. These OHIs are intended to help states build occupational health capacity by providing them with tools to collect and generate important, basic information concerning the occupational health status of the state population and to identify areas in which to focus prevention efforts. In 2005, CSTE released a report compiling OHI data from 13 states. NIOSH provides funding for the OHIs because they are now a required component of state-based cooperative agreements for occupational health surveillance. This report introduces the OHIs and describes CSTE's approach to developing this new occupational health surveillance tool.

Accidents, Occupational↗

[Lies and Latin].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Accidents, Occupational↗