PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16762986

Statins for improving renal outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Sabrina Sandhu·Natasha Wiebe·Linda F Fried·Marcello Tonelli
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Statins frequently are used to prevent cardiovascular events. Several recent studies suggest that statins also may have renal benefits, although this is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the effect of statins on change in kidney function and urinary protein excretion. Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings, and the authors' personal files were searched. Published or unpublished randomized, controlled trials or crossover trials of statins that reported assessment of kidney function or proteinuria were included, and studies of individuals with ESRD were excluded. Data were extracted for study design, subject characteristics, type of statin and dose, baseline/change in cholesterol levels, and outcomes (change in measured or estimated GFR [eGFR] and/or urinary protein excretion). Weighted mean differences were calculated for the change in GFR between statin and control groups using a random-effects model. A random-effects model also was used to calculate the standardized mean difference for the change in urinary protein excretion between groups. Twenty-seven eligible studies with 39,704 participants (21 with data for eGFR and 20 for proteinuria or albuminuria) were identified. Overall, the change in the weighted mean differences for eGFR was statistically significant (1.22 ml/min per yr slower in statin recipients; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 to 2.00). In subgroup analysis, the benefit of statin therapy was statistically significant in studies of participants with cardiovascular disease (0.93 ml/min per yr slower than control subjects; 95% CI 0.10 to 1.76) but was NS for studies of participants with diabetic or hypertensive kidney disease or glomerulonephritis. The standardized mean difference for the reduction in albuminuria or proteinuria as a result of statin therapy was statistically significant (0.58 units of SD greater in statin recipients; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.98). Statin therapy seems to reduce proteinuria modestly and results in a small reduction in the rate of kidney function loss, especially in populations with cardiovascular disease.

Explore related subjects

AlbuminuriaCardiovascular DiseasesGlomerular Filtration RateHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsKidney Failure, ChronicProteinuriaPublication BiasTreatment OutcomeJournal ArticleMeta-AnalysisResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Systematic Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sabrina Sandhu, Natasha Wiebe, Linda F Fried, Marcello Tonelli. 2006-06-08. Statins for improving renal outcomes: a meta-analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2006010012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Urinary albumin excretion is associated with impaired flow- and nitroglycerin-mediated brachial artery dilatation in hypertensive adults.

We investigated whether the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), a measure of albuminuria, is associated with non-invasive measures of arterial function in hypertensive adults without known coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke. UACR was measured in the first voided morning urine sample in 469 non-Hispanic white hypertensive individuals (mean age 62.2+/-9.8 years, 41% men) belonging to hypertensive sibships. High-resolution ultrasonography of the brachial artery was used to assess flow-mediated dilatation (FMD)--an endothelium-dependent response--and nitroglycerin-mediated dilatation (NMD)--an endothelium-independent response. Because of skewed distribution, UACR was log transformed after addition of 0.1. The association of log (UACR+0.1) with FMD and NMD, before and after adjustment for CHD risk factors, serum creatinine, and hypertension medication and statin use was assessed using linear regression analyses. In univariable analyses, variables associated with lower FMD were greater age, male sex, history of smoking, lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, higher serum creatinine and higher log (UACR+0.1); variables associated with lower NMD were greater age, male sex, higher systolic blood pressure, lower HDL cholesterol, higher serum creatinine and higher log (UACR+0.1). In separate stepwise multivariable regression analyses that adjusted for conventional CHD risk factors, serum creatinine and hypertension medication and statin use, higher log (UACR+0.1) was associated with lower brachial artery FMD (P=0.035) and NMD (P=0.0002). These findings highlight the association of increased urinary albumin excretion with impaired vascular reactivity in hypertensive individuals.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed2007

What predicts progression and regression of urinary albumin excretion in the nondiabetic population?

An increase or decrease in urinary albumin excretion (UAE) is associated with, respectively, a higher or lower risk for renal and cardiovascular disease, independent of widely known cardiovascular risk factors. This study aimed to identify factors that are associated with changes in UAE in the nondiabetic population using data of the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End stage Disease (PREVEND) Study, a community-based prospective cohort study. Data of the 6647 nondiabetic participants who completed the first (1997 through 2001) and second (2001 through 2003) screening were used. Change in UAE was categorized as regression (n = 650), stable (n = 5240), or progression (n = 757) on the basis of change in class during follow-up, with classes being a UAE <15, 15 to 30, 30 to 300, and >300 mg/24 h. With the use of stepwise forward multinomial regression analysis changes in BP, fasting glucose concentration, and start of antihypertensive drugs were found to be the most important modifiable variables associated with the risk for progression and regression (P < 0.01 for likelihood ratio test). The odds ratios to develop regression or progression of UAE during follow-up were 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.73) and 1.91 (95% CI 1.72 to 2.12), respectively, per 10-mmHg increase in BP during follow-up, 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.98) and 1.09 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.17), respectively, per 1-mmol/L increase of fasting glucose levels during follow-up, and 1.57 (95% CI 1.21 to 2.06) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.95), respectively, for start of antihypertensive drugs during follow-up. These associations were independent of baseline BP, glucose, body mass index, estimated GFR, and UAE and changes in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein during follow-up. In conclusion, changes in glucose concentration and BP and start of antihypertensive drugs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers in >50% of cases) are associated with progression and regression of UAE in the nondiabetic population. Although associations do not necessarily suggest causality, it is hypothesized that in the general population, the most important ways to reduce UAE are by lowering glucose concentration and BP (including start of antihypertensive medication), even in normotensive, nondiabetic individuals.

Albuminuria↗