PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16776862

Move & Improve: a worksite wellness program in Maine.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We describe the evaluation process and outcomes of Move & Improve, a worksite wellness program in Maine. The evaluation process was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health and community-based participatory research principles. Innovative approaches are required to address burgeoning chronic disease trends and risk factors. Worksites are an ideal setting in which to affect working adults and high-risk individuals. Using community-based participatory research methodology increases community capacity for evaluation, dissemination, and use of evaluation results. CONTEXT: Move & Improve is an ongoing program that was implemented in 1996. Although evaluation data have been collected since the program's inception, a more systematic evaluation based on community-based participatory research principles was undertaken in 2003 and 2004 with the technical assistance of the Maine-Harvard Prevention Research Center and Colby College. METHODS: The Maine-Harvard Prevention Research Center facilitated the development of a program logic model, evaluation questions, data collection instruments, an analysis plan, presentations, and reports. We used a cross-sectional study design with nonparticipant comparison groups. CONSEQUENCES: Data indicate possible program improvement strategies and substantial improvements in lifestyle factors among participants. INTERPRETATION: Limitations of the evaluation include participant self-selection, cross-sectional study design, a lack of adequate resources for evaluation, and the challenges of using community-based participatory research methods. Despite these limitations, Move & Improve program staff consider the evaluation of the program a success and have learned ways to improve the program and future evaluation efforts. Overall satisfaction with the process has been nurtured through community-based participatory research methods. This approach also enabled us to meet key evaluation standards.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michele Polacsek, Liam M O'Brien, Wendie Lagasse, Nicole Hammar. 2006-06-15. Move & Improve: a worksite wellness program in Maine.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16776862/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Creating a robust public health infrastructure for physical activity promotion.

The essential role of physical activity both as an independent protective factor against numerous common chronic diseases and as a means to maintain a healthy weight is gaining increasing scientific recognition. Although the science of physical activity promotion is advancing rapidly, the practice of promoting physical activity at a population level is in its infancy. The virtual absence of a public health practice infrastructure for the promotion of physical activity at the local level presents a critical challenge to control policy for chronic disease, and particularly obesity. To translate the increasing evidence of the value of physical activity into practice will require systemic, multilevel, and multisectoral intervention approaches that build individual capability and organizational capacity for behavior change, create new social norms, and promote policy and environmental changes that support higher levels of energy expenditure across the population. This paper highlights societal changes contributing to inactivity; describes the evolution and current status of population-based public health physical activity promotion efforts in research and practice settings; suggests strategies for engaging decision makers, stakeholders, and the general public in building the necessary infrastructure to effectively promote physical activity; and identifies specific recommendations to spur the creation of a robust public health infrastructure for physical activity.

Exercise↗

Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and insulin resistance: a short update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: High levels of cardiorespiratory fitness and/or habitual physical activity are associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease. The responsible mechanisms are multifarious, but effects on insulin sensitivity are likely to play an important role. The purpose of this review is to highlight some recent evidence on the interrelationships between physical activity, fitness, obesity, genotype and insulin resistance. RECENT FINDINGS: Effects on cardiorespiratory fitness and abdominal obesity are both likely to contribute to the insulin-sensitizing effects of regular physical activity. Recent data suggest that at least in older adults, the intensity of an exercise intervention may influence the magnitude of changes in insulin sensitivity, and emerging data suggest that individual changes in insulin sensitivity following an exercise programme may, in part, be influenced by genotype. SUMMARY: Increasing physical activity reduces insulin resistance. As both intensity of exercise and genetic factors may modulate the magnitude of this effect, current physical activity for health guidelines that emphasize engagement in moderate-intensity physical activity in a 'one-size-fits-all' approach may need revision in the future to optimize the potential benefits accrued from individuals becoming more active.

Exercise↗