PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16779438

Using computerized physician order entry to decrease insurance denials.

Abstract

Insurance denials delay payments for tests to medical institutions and can decrease patient satisfaction due to unexpected billing. Our institution utilizes an ambulatory electronic health record (EHR) for routine clinical care that includes computerized physician order entry (CPOE). At our institution as well as others, considerable cost is associated with inappropriate diagnostic coding of needed procedures and tests by the physician. We developed a series of CPOE alerts and order sets targeting specific tests to address this problem. As a result, preliminary data shows that insurance denials fell by up to 37% for the targeted tests.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alan M Weiss, Anil Jain. 2005. Using computerized physician order entry to decrease insurance denials.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16779438/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence.

Electronic health records (EHRs) are promising tools to improve quality and efficiency in health care, but data on their adoption rate are limited. We identified surveys on EHR adoption and assessed their quality. Although surveys returned widely different estimates of EHR use, when available information is limited to studies of high or medium quality, national estimates are possible: Through 2005, approximately 23.9 percent of physicians used EHRs in the ambulatory setting, while 5 percent of hospitals used computerized physician order entry. Large gaps in knowledge, including information about EHR use among safety-net providers, pose critical challenges for the development of policies aimed at speeding adoption.

Ambulatory Care Information Systems↗

Computer technology and the childhood immunization programme: an investigation of low uptake rates in Coventry Primary Care Trust.

BACKGROUND: The childhood vaccination programme in Coventry Primary Care Trust (PCT) has resulted in consistently low uptake rates for a number of years. After an evaluation of operational processes, an examination of the data systems was performed. METHODS: The under-reporting of vaccinations performed and methodology issues were investigated using data collected by the Child Health Information Department (CHID) and the Finance Department. RESULTS: Data held by the Finance Department result in an uptake rate of between 0.79 and 1.92% higher than those held by the CHID. Locally, the Southwest Child Health (SWIFT) system, the programme used to calculate uptake rates by many of the PCTs across the country, excludes those children residing outside the boundary but registered within it. Coventry PCT's Cover of Vaccination Evaluated Rapidly (COVER) statistics are based on a subgroup of the responsible population. CONCLUSIONS: The computer technology currently utilized by the NHS provides inaccurate statistics for the COVER programme. Systematic under-reporting to the CHID results in moderately lowered uptake rates. A programming anomaly in the SWIFT system has resulted in the collection of data based on a subgroup of the responsible population. This undermines the validity of the statistics collected and renders comparability of data between different PCTs, particularly those using different systems, difficult.

Ambulatory Care Information Systems↗