PubMed · 16821287
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Jonathan Abrams, Carole A Jones, Peter Kirkpatrick. 2006. Ranolazine.. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2069
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Inhibition of fatty acid oxidation has been reported to be cardioprotective against myocardial ischemic injury; however, recent studies have questioned whether the cardioprotection associated with putative fatty acid oxidation inhibitors, such as ranolazine and trimetazidine, are due to changes in substrate oxidation. Therefore, the goals of this study were to compare the effects of ranolazine with a new fatty acid oxidation inhibitor, CVT-4325 [(R)-1-(2-methylbenzo[d]thiazol-5-yloxy)-3-(4-((5-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)methyl)-piperazin-1-yl)propan-2-ol], on carbohydrate and fatty acid oxidation and on left ventricular (LV) function in the response to ischemia/reperfusion in rat isolated perfused hearts. Metabolic fluxes were determined in hearts perfused in an isovolumic Langendorff mode using 13C nuclear magnetic resonance isotopomer analysis or in isolated working hearts using [14C]glucose and [3H]palmitate, with and without 10 microM ranolazine or 3 microM CVT-4325. Isovolumic perfused hearts were also subjected to 30 min of low-flow ischemia (0.3 ml/min) and 60 min of reperfusion, and working hearts were subjected to 15 min of zero-flow ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Regardless of the experimental protocol, ranolazine had no effect on carbohydrate or fatty acid oxidation, whereas CVT-4325 significantly reduced fatty acid oxidation up to approximately 7-fold with a concomitant increase in carbohydrate oxidation. At these same concentrations, although ranolazine significantly improved LV functional recovery following ischemia/reperfusion, CVT-4325 had no significant protective effect. These results demonstrate that at pharmacologically relevant concentrations, ischemic protection by ranolazine was not mediated by inhibition of fatty acid oxidation and conversely that inhibition of fatty acid oxidation with CVT-4325 was not associated with improved LV functional recovery.
PURPOSE: A review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, safety, and efficacy of ranolazine is presented. SUMMARY: Ranolazine has recently been approved as adjunctive treatment for chronic stable angina (CSA). Data suggest that ranolazine exerts its antiischemic effect through antagonism of the late sodium current and other cardiac ion channels. Peak plasma levels of ranolazine have been observed two to five hours following repeated dosing and are unaffected by food. In placebo-controlled and active-controlled clinical trials conducted with ranolazine, ranolazine has been effective in the treatment of patients with CSA. One trial demonstrated that monotherapy with extended-release ranolazine was effective against angina and ischemia in patients with CSA. Ranolazine improved exercise duration and time to onset of angina. In a trial in which ranolazine was given in combination with atenolol, diltiazem, or amlodipine, ranolazine produced clinically significant improvement in exercise duration and reduced the incidence of anginal attacks compared with placebo. Another trial demonstrated that extended-release ranolazine 1000 mg given twice daily reduced mean weekly angina episodes in patients with chronic angina. Ranolazine is generally well tolerated. In clinical trials, adverse effects were seen more in the ranolazine groups than in the placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Despite a lack of mortality data, ranolazine has demonstrated its efficacy and safety, either as monotherapy or in combination with other antianginal agents, in the management of CSA. Patients who fail optimal therapy with standard-of-care antianginal agents are the best candidates for treatment with ranolazine.
More women than men with myocardial infarction have previous stable angina pectoris. Women also have an increased incidence of angina after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. Data from 1,737 patients with stable angina pectoris in 4 international trials (Monotherapy Assessment of Ranolazine In Stable Angina [MARISA], Combination Assessment of Ranolazine In Stable Angina [CARISA], Ranolazine Versus Atenolol Comparison in Chronic Angina [RAN080], and Efficacy of Ranolazine in Chronic Angina [ERICA]) were used to compare efficacy and safety of ranolazine therapy for angina in women and men. MARISA, CARISA, and RAN080 included exercise testing; CARISA, RAN080, and ERICA assessed angina frequency and nitroglycerin consumption; and ERICA included quality-of-life assessment using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. MARISA, CARISA, and ERICA used the extended-release formulation of ranolazine; RAN080 used ranolazine immediate release. All 4 studies showed overall efficacy and safety of ranolazine. In subgroup analyses, women showed less improvement than men in exercise testing. However, similar improvements for women and men were noted in angina frequency and nitroglycerin consumption, and in ERICA, in the angina frequency dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. In conclusion, explanations for the gender treatment differences for exercise parameters but comparable effects on decrease in angina frequency and nitroglycerin use are uncertain, but may include differences in patient demographics, reasons for stopping exercise, and type of exercise protocol used.