PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16833040

Thrombolysis beyond the three-hour time window.

Abstract

Intravenous (i.v.) thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA, i.v. 0.9 mg/kg body weight) has been approved by European health authorities in 2002, with a 3-hr time window. The meta-analysis of i.v. rt-PA trials suggests efficacy of rt-PA up to 4.5 to 6 hr. However, treatment efficacy declines rapidly over time: the numbers of patients needed to treat to prevent 1 death or dependency are respectively 7, 12, and > 30 in the 0-3 hr, 0-6 hr, and 3-6 hr time windows. Magnetic resonance imaging may be the best way to select candidates for thrombolysis beyond 3 hr, on the basis of the presence of arterial occlusion and mismatch between diffusion and perfusion images. New trials are testing the possibility of extending the time window. Trials with new thrombolytic agents, ultrasound thrombolysis, and mechanical thrombolysis also are running or planned in the 3- to 6-hr time window. The 3-hr limit is just a matter of safety. Patients should be treated as soon as possible, and the earliest is the best.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Didier Leys, Dominique Deplanque. Thrombolysis beyond the three-hour time window.. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641960600549371

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Using engineering control principles to inform the design of adaptive interventions: a conceptual introduction.

The goal of this paper is to describe the role that control engineering principles can play in developing and improving the efficacy of adaptive, time-varying interventions. It is demonstrated that adaptive interventions constitute a form of feedback control system in the context of behavioral health. Consequently, drawing from ideas in control engineering has the potential to significantly inform the analysis, design, and implementation of adaptive interventions, leading to improved adherence, better management of limited resources, a reduction of negative effects, and overall more effective interventions. This article illustrates how to express an adaptive intervention in control engineering terms, and how to use this framework in a computer simulation to investigate the anticipated impact of intervention design choices on efficacy. The potential benefits of operationalizing decision rules based on control engineering principles are particularly significant for adaptive interventions that involve multiple components or address co-morbidities, situations that pose significant challenges to conventional clinical practice.

Drug Administration Schedule↗