PubMed · 16838153
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Abhik Ghosh. 2006-07-13. Just how good is DFT?. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-006-0134-5
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Although density functional theory (DFT) provides a generally good description of transition metal systems, we have identified several cases, involving Fe(III) porphyrins and related systems, where common functionals fail to correctly describe the energetics of the different low-lying spin states. The question of metal- versus ligand-centered oxidation in high-valent transition metal complexes is also a challenging one for DFT calculations, as I have tried to illustrate with examples from among porphyrin, corrole, biliverdine, and NO complexes. In a number of cases, I have compared results obtained with different exchange-correlation functionals; in addition, I have added a discussion on the relative performance of pure versus hybrid functionals. Finally, I have offered some thoughts on the role that traditional wavefunction-based ab initio methods, now essentially absent from the bioinorganic arena, might play in the future.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Metal-thiolate active sites play major roles in bioinorganic chemistry. The M--S(thiolate) bonds can be very covalent, and involve different orbital interactions. Spectroscopic features of these active sites (intense, low-energy charge transfer transitions) reflect the high covalency of the M--S(thiolate) bonds. The energy of the metal-thiolate bond is fairly insensitive to its ionic/covalent and pi/sigma nature as increasing M--S covalency reduces the charge distribution, hence the ionic term, and these contributions can compensate. Thus, trends observed in stability constants (i.e., the Irving-Williams series) mostly reflect the dominantly ionic contribution to bonding of the innocent ligand being replaced by the thiolate. Due to high effective nuclear charges of the Cu(II) and Fe(III) ions, the cupric- and ferric-thiolate bonds are very covalent, with the former having strong pi and the latter having more sigma character. For the blue copper site, the high pi covalency couples the metal ion into the protein for rapid directional long range electron transfer. For rubredoxins, because the redox active molecular orbital is pi in nature, electron transfer tends to be more localized in the vicinity of the active site. Although the energy of hydrogen bonding of the protein environment to the thiolate ligands tends to be fairly small, H-bonding can significantly affect the covalency of the metal-thiolate bond and contribute to redox tuning by the protein environment.