PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16865382

[Clinical pathways. Implementation in a urological department].

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical pathways are directions for standardised treatment processes for different diseases or procedures in a hospital. These pathways are developed within a team of several professions and are used as order and procedure sheets. Experiences with this element of quality management are limited in Germany. METHODS: The development and the implementation process of 15 pathways in a urological department are described. A clinical pathway for female incontinence surgery (suburethral tape) is presented as an example. The effects of the pathways are evaluated on a routine basis. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of the patients were treated according to a clinical pathway. The advantages of clinical pathways are a better structuring and transparency of medical processes, a reduction of documentation, improvements in medical education and savings in time, hospital stay of the patients and costs. Expenses for pharmaceuticals were significantly reduced in connection with development of the pathways. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of clinical pathways is a complex but rewarding project. It can be expected that clinical pathways will be rapidly distributed in the near future and that they will contribute to improvements of health care quality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Thiel, K Eisenblätter, M Kurzidem, P Hutmacher, A Herde, H A Müller. 2006. [Clinical pathways. Implementation in a urological department].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-006-1138-z

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical management. Design for living.

91 per cent of patients started treatment within two mounths of referral, compared to 70-80 per cent last year. The last five months has seen rapid progress at a rate of 2 per cent a month. Sustaining improvement depends on leadership, measurement and looking at the whole patient pathway.

Critical Pathways↗

[Clinical pathways -- first results of a systematic IT-supported application at a surgical department of a university hospital].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In analogy to industrial process management, clinical pathways have been introduced for operational process organisation in orthopedic and interventional procedures as well as for conservative treatments. Within this study, introduction and continuous, systematic application of clinical pathways at a surgical department of a university hospital was investigated. METHODS: Analysis was performed by IT-based (SAP/i. s. h.med) evaluation of the registered data regarding pathway violations. Additionally, patients' records were matched with the computerized data for quality assurance of pathway documentation. RESULTS: 501 patients were entered in 16 clinical pathways (31 +/- 39 patients per pathway). The mean period from the introduction of a distinct pathway to the data acquisition of the present study ranged from 2 to 14 months (mean 7+/-7.5 months). Pathway violations correlated with the complexity, but not with the period since the pathway was introduced. Organisational reasons next to medical reasons (i. e. delayed gastric function or wound healing) were the most frequent causes for pathway violations. CONCLUSION: Clinical pathways may not only be realised for operative procedures or conservative treatments, but represent a clinical and administrative management instrument at a surgical department of a university hospital for daily work routine. They are suitable as an instrument for clinical quality and risk management, as an economic control instrument in reorganisation phases as well as in the routine of surgical clinics.

Critical Pathways↗