PubMed · 16888579
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
O Monnet, J P Pelage. [Interventional radiology].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0221-0363(06)71707-3
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), chemical shift spectroscopy imaging (CSI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) create novel challenges in terms of data storage and management: huge amounts of raw data are generated, the results of analysis may depend on the software and settings that have been used, and most often intermediate files are inherently not compliant with the current DICOM (digital imaging and communication in medicine) standard, as they contain multidimensional complex and tensor arrays and various other types of data structures. A software architecture, referred to as Bio-Image Warehouse System (BIWS), which can be used alongside a radiology information system/picture archiving and communication system (RIS/PACS) system to store neuroimaging data for research purposes, is presented. The system architecture is conceived with the purpose of enabling to query by diagnosis according to a predefined two-layered classification taxonomy. The operational impact of the system and the time needed to get acquainted with the web-based interface and with the taxonomy are found to be limited. The development of modules enabling automated creation of statistical templates is proposed.
Eight cases of neurosurgical operations being performed on the wrong side were studied. Safeguards of confidentiality were used. In seven cases side marking was not done and the surgeons felt that had it been done, the mistake would have or may have been prevented. In all but one case the surgeon's normal side check was omitted. Distracting circumstances contributed to the checks being omitted in these seven cases. In the one case where the check was carried out the mistake was made because the patient had been marked on the wrong side. In no case was the mistake made because of ambiguous or absent site data in the imaging or notes. It is concluded that to prevent these mistakes emphasis should be placed on ensuring that the preoperative site check is completed more than on ensuring that unambiguous side information is available in the notes and imaging.