PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16900521

Buccal plate excision for buccal paramandibular spread.

Kumar Alok Pathak·Mandar S Deshpande·Navneet Mathur·Amit S Date·Pankaj Chaturvedi·Prathamesh S Pai·Devendra A Chaukar·Anil K D'Cruz
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Cancer of buccal gingival sulcus lie in close proximity to mandible but tend to invade bone late in the course of disease. Segmental mandibulectomy advocated for these tumors results in cosmetic disfigurement and functional impairment. We, for the first time, describe a mandibular preservation alternative, in form of buccal cortical plate excision, for these tumors.

Explore related subjects

CheekGingival NeoplasmsHumansMandibleMandibular NeoplasmsMouth MucosaOral Surgical ProceduresJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kumar Alok Pathak, Mandar S Deshpande, Navneet Mathur, Amit S Date, Pankaj Chaturvedi, Prathamesh S Pai, Devendra A Chaukar, Anil K D'Cruz. 2006-09-01. Buccal plate excision for buccal paramandibular spread.. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20594

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Impalement injuries of the oral cavity in children: a case report and survey of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Impalement injuries of the soft palate and oropharynx are common in children, especially those of preschool age. These injuries are particularly common in toddlers, given their propensity to fall easily while carrying objects in their mouths. Although most of these injuries do not have lasting sequelae, some can have devastating neurological complications, and consequently, careful assessment of the patient during the early stages of trauma is imperative. Close follow-up for up to 72 h, and parental counselling and instruction should be considered as part of their immediate care. CASE REPORT: A case of toothbrush impalement in a 4-year-old child is presented. The foreign body was noted to be lodged in the cheek. After careful triaging, history taking and appropriate imaging, surgical removal of this brush was carried out uneventfully under general anaesthesia. No further complications were noted postoperatively, and because of the type of injury, the patient was discharged within 24 h and reviewed as an outpatient. CONCLUSION: A survey of the literature confirms that most injuries of this kind can be treated conservatively, and in many cases, without surgical intervention. However, careful assessment by an experienced clinician is necessary to rule out other complications. The present paper discusses the prevalence, management and complications associated with impalement injuries of the oral cavity in children.

Cheek↗