PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1692274

Computerized interpretation of electromyographic data.

Abstract

A computer program was developed to plan, interpret and report the analysis of electromyographic data. The computer model formalized electrodiagnostic decisions through the use of a computational method known as augmented transition networks (ATN). The diagnoses of entrapment neuropathies, plexopathies, and radiculopathies were incorporated into the computer model. The system analyzed a difficult set of electromyographic (EMG) cases and the computer and physician reached the same conclusion 78% of the time. The system could explain the reason it reached its diagnostic conclusions and report to the physician all the relevant pathophysiologic derangements. The system could also offer advice on how one could strengthen a tentative diagnostic conclusion. While this system is limited in its diagnostic coverage of EMG problems, it may be a useful assistant to the electromyographer by focusing attention on significant pathophysiologic derangements detected on EMG examination.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P W Jamieson. 1990. Computerized interpretation of electromyographic data.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(90)90084-w

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of the Sperm Quality Analyzer IIC variables with the computer-aided sperm analysis estimates.

Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA) IIC, an upgrade version, is an inexpensive device and provides a quantitative estimation of sperm motility, whereas the use of computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) provides high precision and provision of quantitative data on sperm kinetics. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if the SQA IIC variables correlated with the CASA estimates. Semen quality analysis of 71 fresh semen samples was performed using SQA IIC and CASA. Total sperm concentration, percentage of progressively motile sperm, percentage of normal morphology, motile sperm concentration, sperm motility index (SMI) and functional sperm count (FSC) determinations were performed using SQA IIC. Sperm concentration, sperm motility, and sperm motion variables including amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH), beat cross frequency (BCF), curvilinear velocity (VCL), straight line velocity (VSL), average path velocity (VAP), linearity (LIN=VSL/VCL), and straightness (STR=VSL/VAP) were evaluated simultaneously on the same semen samples using CASA. The sperm characteristics were compared between SQA IIC and CASA. There were significant correlations of sperm concentration (r=0.634, p < 0.0001), sperm motility (r=0.697, p < 0.0001), and motile sperm concentration (r=0.757, p < 0.0001) between the two devices. Both SMI and FSC significantly correlated with eight CASA estimates, including sperm concentration, sperm motility, motile sperm concentration, ALH, VCL, VSL, VAP, and Rapid. SQA IIC is simple and easy to use. Moreover, the SQA IIC variables well correlated with the CASA estimates. As a screening test for semen quality, SQA IIC is considered as useful in the management of male infertility.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗

Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry.

PURPOSE: To determine which machine learning classifier learns best to interpret standard automated perimetry (SAP) and to compare the best of the machine classifiers with the global indices of STATPAC 2 and with experts in glaucoma. METHODS: Multilayer perceptrons (MLP), support vector machines (SVM), mixture of Gaussian (MoG), and mixture of generalized Gaussian (MGG) classifiers were trained and tested by cross validation on the numerical plot of absolute sensitivity plus age of 189 normal eyes and 156 glaucomatous eyes, designated as such by the appearance of the optic nerve. The authors compared performance of these classifiers with the global indices of STATPAC, using the area under the ROC curve. Two human experts were judged against the machine classifiers and the global indices by plotting their sensitivity-specificity pairs. RESULTS: MoG had the greatest area under the ROC curve of the machine classifiers. Pattern SD (PSD) and corrected PSD (CPSD) had the largest areas under the curve of the global indices. MoG had significantly greater ROC area than PSD and CPSD. Human experts were not better at classifying visual fields than the machine classifiers or the global indices. CONCLUSIONS: MoG, using the entire visual field and age for input, interpreted SAP better than the global indices of STATPAC. Machine classifiers may augment the global indices of STATPAC.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗