PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16924169

Magnetic resonance-guided prostate interventions.

Steven J Haker·Robert V Mulkern·Joseph R Roebuck·Agnieska Szot Barnes·Simon Dimaio·Nobuhiko Hata·Clare M C Tempany
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We review our experience using an open 0.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) interventional unit to guide procedures in the prostate. This system allows access to the patient and real-time MR imaging simultaneously and has made it possible to perform prostate biopsy and brachytherapy under MR guidance. We review MR imaging of the prostate and its use in targeted therapy, and describe our use of image processing methods such as image registration to further facilitate precise targeting. We describe current developments with a robot assist system being developed to aid radioactive seed placement.

Explore related subjects

BiopsyBrachytherapyContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMalePatient SelectionProstatic NeoplasmsRoboticsJournal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Steven J Haker, Robert V Mulkern, Joseph R Roebuck, Agnieska Szot Barnes, Simon Dimaio, Nobuhiko Hata, Clare M C Tempany. 2005. Magnetic resonance-guided prostate interventions.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002142-200510000-00003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗