PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16927308

Vascular disrupting agents.

Abstract

It has been well established that a functioning vascular supply is essential for solid tumor growth and metastases. In the absence of a viable vascular network, tumors are unable to grow beyond a few millimeters and therefore remain dormant. Initiation of angiogenesis allows for continued tumor growth and progression. Targeting tumor vasculature, either by inhibiting growth of new tumor blood vessels (antiangiogenic agents) or by destroying the already present tumor vessels (vascular disrupting agents; VDA), is an area of extensive research in the development of new antitumor agents. These two groups differ in their direct physiological target, the type or extent of disease that is likely to be susceptible, and the treatment schedule. VDAs target the established tumor blood vessels, resulting in tumor ischemia and necrosis. These agents show more immediate effects compared to antiangiogenic agents and may have more efficacy against advanced bulky disease. VDAs can be divided into two groups--ligand-bound and small molecule agents. Both VDA groups have demonstrated antitumor effects and tumor core necrosis, but consistently leave a thin rim of viable tumor cells at the periphery of the tumor. More evidence suggests VDAs will have their greatest effect in combination with conventional chemotherapy or other modes of treatment that attack this outer rim of cells.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Pilat, P M Lorusso. 2006-11-01. Vascular disrupting agents.. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.20783

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The immunosuppressant FTY720 inhibits tumor angiogenesis via the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1.

FTY720, a sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) analog, acts as an immunosuppressant through trapping of T cells in secondary lymphoid tissues. FTY720 was also shown to prevent tumor growth and to inhibit vascular permeability. The MTT proliferation assay illustrated that endothelial cells are more susceptible to the anti-proliferative effect of FTY720 than Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC1) cells. In a spheroid angiogenesis model, FTY720 potently inhibited the sprouting activity of VEGF-A-stimulated endothelial cells even at concentrations that apparently had no anti-proliferative effect. Mechanistically, the anti-angiogenic effect of the general S1P receptor agonist FTY720 was mimicked by the specific S1P1 receptor agonist SEW2871. Moreover, the anti-angiogenic effect of FTY720 was abrogated in the presence of CXCR4-neutralizing antibodies. This indicates that the effect was at least in part mediated by the S1P1 receptor and involved transactivation of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor. Additionally, we could illustrate in a coculture spheroid model, employing endothelial and smooth muscle cells (SMCs), that the latter confer a strong protective effect regarding the action of FTY720 upon the endothelial cells. In a subcutaneous LLC1 tumor model, the anti-angiogenic capacity translated into a reduced tumor size in syngeneic C57BL/6 mice. Consistently, in the Matrigel plug in vivo assay, 10 mg/kg/d FTY720 resulted in a strong inhibition of angiogenesis as demonstrated by a reduced capillary density. Thus, in organ transplant patients, FTY720 may prove efficacious in preventing graft rejection as well as tumor development.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗