PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16931131

What does it take to replace an old functioning information system with a new one? A case study.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the case of a municipal wound care practice and the process of designing a specific computer documentation record system. In carrying out our kind of action research, creation of the system that integrate digital photos, was supposed to remake the old wound care documentation system and transform it into a more advanced and unified tool. METHODS: Ethnographic studies were conducted before and parallel to the design work. Nurse practitioners were involved in design and actively determining essentials of the computer artefact. Developmental Work Research (DWR) is the framework against which data from the work practice and system development where analyzed and interpreted. RESULTS: First, an old-fashioned information system (IS) within health care work will not successfully be replaced by a new one, unless the new is better "as a whole", that is, better supports work practices of a range of occupational and professional workers. Second, when designing information system for the public sector, system designers will almost always face dilemmas based on a contradiction between central, high level interest and a local level work-practice perspective. DISCUSSION: Our study reveals that the work practice of the municipal nurses is characterized by three distinctive features: High mobility, the need for face-to-face interaction in different locations, and a great variety of artefact usage. This implies that a new information system has to be "better as a whole" dealing with those characteristics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hans Kyhlbäck, Berthel Sutter. 2006-08-23. What does it take to replace an old functioning information system with a new one? A case study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.047

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of technological interventions on the safety of a medication-use system.

PURPOSE: A study was conducted to assess the effects and outcomes of implementing new technology into the medication-use process. METHODS: A pharmacy computer system, automated dispensing cabinets, and point-of-care products were implemented. The hypotheses of the study were that system errors in each phase of the medication-use process would decrease with the implementation of each technological application and that workload measures, such as staffing and inventory levels, would increase. Using a scripted questionnaire, interviews of participating staff (registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, nursing-unit clerks, pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, physicians, and physician assistants) were conducted to determine their impressions of the safety of the medication-use system before and after the implementation of technology. All hospitalwide errors were reported monthly between November 2002 and July 2005 by the number of errors per 1000 patient days and were categorized by error type. The accuracy of the medication administration record was examined; the pharmacy dispensing process was evaluated for accuracy, timeliness, and system changes; the accuracy of medication administration was observed; and staffing changes were also evaluated. RESULTS: Because of the technology implementation, the accuracy of patient identification was introduced, process changes and technological design identified potential failure modes in the medication administration process, inventory increased, turn-around time to process medication doses in the pharmacy decreased, accuracy of medication administration increased, and the staffing of nurses and pharmacists increased. CONCLUSION: Implementation of new technology into the medication management system standardized the medication administration processes, decreased turnaround time for processing medication orders, and increased accuracy of medication administration to patients.

Diffusion of Innovation↗

How to develop a business case for quality.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the steps in developing a business case for quality-enhancing interventions (QEIs) in health care. ANALYSIS: The development of a business case for QEIs in health care involves 11 steps. These steps include (1) describing the intervention, (2) determining perspective, (3) identifying the effects of the intervention on quality, (4) designing the study, (5) identifying and measuring cash flows, (6) considering the effects of capacity constraints, (7) selecting a measure of return on investment, (8) determining the time horizon for the analysis, (9) determining the discount rate, (10) adjusting costs and savings for inflation, and (11) determining organizational readiness for business case development. A checklist offers guidance on assessing readiness for the business case. CONCLUSION: The absence of a 'business case' for quality is frequently cited as the reason health care organizations do not implement QEIs, despite decades of careful research demonstrating their effectiveness. Our continuing commitment to advancing the discipline of business case analysis is based on a belief that delineating the cost and economic implications of investments in QEIs is a critical threshold issue to widespread adoption of evidence-based quality improvements. We believe it is appropriate and timely to consider how best to standardize approaches and move the field of business case analysis forward.

Diffusion of Innovation↗