PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16934030

How does hepatitis C virus enter cells?

Gundo Diedrich
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) exists in different forms in the circulation of infected people: lipoprotein bound and lipoprotein free, enveloped and nonenveloped. Viral particles with the highest infectivity are associated with lipoproteins, whereas lipoprotein-free virions are poorly infectious. The detection of HCV's envelope proteins E1 and E2 in lipoprotein-associated virions has been challenging. Because lipoproteins are readily endocytosed, some forms of HCV might utilize their association with lipoproteins rather than E1 and E2 for cell attachment and internalization. However, vaccination of chimpanzees with recombinant envelope proteins protected the animals from hepatitis C infection, suggesting an important role for E1 and E2 in cell entry. It seems possible that different forms of HCV use different receptors to attach to and enter cells. The putative receptors and the assays used for their validation are discussed in this review.

Explore related subjects

HepacivirusHepatitis CHumansJournal ArticleReviewValidation Study

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gundo Diedrich. 2006. How does hepatitis C virus enter cells?. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05379.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Hepatitis C Virus Enhances Lysosome-Associated Membrane Protein 2 A Transcription Through Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 to Support Viral Replication.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) establishes persistent infection by rewiring host stress-response pathways. Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) contributes to HCV replication, but it remains unclear whether HCV regulates lysosome-associated membrane protein 2 A (LAMP-2A), the rate-limiting receptor for CMA. Here, we examined LAMP-2A regulation in HCV-infected Huh-7.5 cells. HCV infection increased LAMP-2A promoter activity, mRNA, and protein abundance, indicating transcriptional upregulation. Among candidate stress-responsive transcription factors, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), and nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFAT1) were elevated in infected cells. However, promoter mutagenesis identified NRF2 as the principal direct regulator. Mutation of the NRF2-responsive antioxidant response element markedly reduced basal and HCV-induced LAMP-2A promoter activity. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed NRF2 association with the LAMP-2A promoter, and HCV infection increased nuclear accumulation and Ser40 phosphorylation of NRF2. Functionally, shRNA-mediated knockdown of LAMP-2A reduced intracellular HCV RNA and protein levels. These findings identify an NRF2-LAMP-2A regulatory axis engaged during HCV infection and support a model in which HCV upregulates LAMP-2A to establish a cellular environment favorable for viral replication.

Hepacivirus↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of hepatitis C virus RNA.

BACKGROUND: The Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of HCV RNA has recently been introduced. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the performance of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay was evaluated and compared to the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test. STUDY DESIGN: Accuracy, linearity, interassay and intra-assay variations were determined, and a total of 243 routine clinical samples were investigated. RESULTS: When accuracy of the new assay was tested, the majority of results were found to be within +/-0.5 log(10) unit of the results obtained by reference laboratories. Determination of linearity resulted in a quasilinear curve up to 1.0 x 10(6)IU/ml. The interassay variation ranged from 15% to 32%, and the intra-assay variation ranged from 5% to 8%. When clinical samples were tested by the Abbott RealTime HCV assay and the results were compared with those obtained by the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test, the results for 93% of all samples with positive results by both tests were found to be within +/-1.0 log(10) unit. The viral loads for all patients measured by the Abbott and Roche assays showed a high correlation (R(2)=0.93); quantitative results obtained by the Abbott assay were found to be lower than those obtained by the Roche assay. CONCLUSIONS: The Abbott RealTime HCV assay proved to be suitable for use in the routine diagnostic laboratory. The time to results was similar for both of the assays.

Hepacivirus↗