PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16944721

Anesthesia systems for ambulatory surgery settings.

Abstract

This Evaluation presents ECRI's detailed findings for two anesthesia systems designed for the ambulatory surgery market-the Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Aespire 7100 and the Draeger Medical Fabius Tiro. The study examines whether and how well the systems can meet the needs of the typical patient population for this application, and it considers factors such as the adequacy of the systems' safety features, the comprehensiveness of their pre-use checks, and ease of use. We subjected the two systems to the same test protocol that is detailed in our July 2006 Evaluation of anesthesia systems designed for inpatient surgical applications. While the six systems evaluated in that issue could also be used in outpatient clinics and other ambulatory surgery centers, such systems are not the most economical choices for these facilities. The two systems we evaluate in the current study offer performance similar to that of the inpatient units, without many of the (often expensive) features that would likely go unused in an ambulatory surgery setting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2006. Anesthesia systems for ambulatory surgery settings.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16944721/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗