PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16957661

Sedationless upper endoscopy.

Abstract

The use of sedation with peroral passage of conventionally sized endoscopes for upper endoscopy is the standard practice for most endoscopists in the United States. The administration of sedatives requires time-consuming and resource-intensive patient monitoring, has substantial cost, and can produce side effects and rare complications. Ultra-thin videoendoscopes (outer diameter less than 6 mm) have been developed, can easily be passed transorally or transnasally without sedation, and have been shown to be well tolerated and accurate. Unsedated upper endoscopy can provide an efficient, cost-effective alternative to standard endoscopy, should be useful for endoscopic screening, and can be offered as an option to conventional sedated examination.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Amitabh Chak, Richard I Rothstein. 2006. Sedationless upper endoscopy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16957661/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Clinical experience with the hygienic reprocessing of rigid endoscopes lacking a working channel with reference to practicability in clinical routine].

BACKGROUND: Contaminated medical products may be vectors for infections. A safe disinfection method for the optical instruments used by ENT specialists is undoubtedly needed. So far, a standard method that sufficiently covers the risk of infection for patients and medical staff alike, while serving the need of practicability in daily routine, has not been established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the ENT departments of the Mannheim and Kaiserslautern hospitals, a study on the practicability of disinfection rigid optical instruments lacking working channels was conducted using cleaning and disinfection automats. A total of 735 patients were examined (Hopkins 30 degrees and 70 degrees) and the endoscopes subsequently sterilized using a cleaning and disinfection automat. RESULTS: Each cleaning cycle took about 40 min. Examining 70-100 patients a day, a minimum of eight 70 degrees Hopkins endoscopes would be needed. CONCLUSION: The sterilization of medical products such as endoscopes is the best practice, but certain hindrances, such as loss of time and costs involved, complicate its general application.

Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal↗