PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16967614

[Antiphospholipid syndrome].

Abstract

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), first described and termed in the early 1980's, is defined by its clinical and laboratory signs. If other disorders inducing antibody production are excluded, APS may be considered a primary disease. Or it can be a secondary condition that is usually seen in systemic diseases of connective tissues. The main concept of APS is based on strong association between its clinical and laboratory manifestations and patient's medical history. Clinical signs include recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis or repeated fetal losses; laboratory criteria involve lupus anticoagulant (LA) syndrome or medium and high titres of anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies. Thus defined, APS represents the most common form of acquired thrombophilic conditions while the basic concept lies in strong association between specific clinical manifestations and repeated detection of LA or aCL. Antiphospholipid antibodies (LA and aCL) are extremely heterogeneous antibody groups whose effect on processes at different levels of coagulation cascade varies. Their effect can be analogical to the action of phospholipid surfaces at various points of blood coagulation. This process usually results in development of a certain degree of thrombophilia. Present level of understanding of APS indicates that characteristics of clinical signs and detection and evaluation of antiphospholipid antibodies have not been definitely established yet and are to be specified with the help of molecular geneticists, immunologists, biochemists, hematologists and rheumatologists.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Z Fojtík. [Antiphospholipid syndrome].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16967614/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of a new silica clotting time in the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants.

INTRODUCTION: A new commercial silica clotting time (SCT), the HemosIL SCT assay (Instrumentation Laboratory, Milan, Italy) was evaluated in the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants (LAC). This integrated test system for screening and confirmation was compared with the frequently used aPTT-based PTT-LA and Staclot-LA (Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France) in a patient population investigated for LAC and in a subpopulation who met the clinical criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 201 samples were analysed with the HemosIL SCT assay. Own reference values were calculated. Results are expressed as measured clotting times in seconds or as normalised ratios. RESULTS: SCT screen and PTT-LA had a sensitivity of, 61.1% and 63.8%, respectively. Normalising the results gained sensitivity up to 72.2% and 90%, respectively. The confirmation SCT and the Staclot-LA had a sensitivity of 30.6% and 63.9% with a specificity of 86.7% and 100%, respectively. Sensitivity of SCT for detecting LAC in clinical criteria positive patients was lower compared to aPTT and dRVVT (45.8% versus 66.7% and 65%). Combination of SCT/dRVVT and aPTT/dRVVT gave a sensitivity of 51.2% and 63.6%, with a specificity of 50.0% and 52.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with PTT-LA as screening test, the SCT screen shows an acceptable sensitivity. However, the HemosIL SCT assay including the confirmation step, has a much lower sensitivity in the diagnosis of LAC in comparison with the Staclot-LA test. Combining the HemosIL SCT assay with dRVVT results in a better sensitivity, although lower than the combined aPTT/dRVVT based method as usually performed in our lab.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome↗

Bilateral medial cerebellar infarction in a patient positive for lupus anticoagulant.

Bilateral medial cerebellar infarction occurring simultaneously is rare. We describe a middle aged male with bilateral cerebellar infarction complicated by subsequent left superior cerebellar artery infarction. Lupus anticoagulant was positive. Though the prognosis is usually considered good, our patient made poor recovery.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome↗