PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16972167

Do benzodiazepines mimic reverse-turn structures?

Abstract

The role of benzodiazepine derivatives (BZD) as a privileged scaffold that mimics beta-turn structures (Ripka et al. (1993) Tetrahedron 49:3593-3608) in peptide/protein recognition was reexamined in detail. Stable BZD ring conformers were determined with MM3, and experimental reverse-turn structures were extracted from the basis set of protein crystal structures previously defined by Ripka et al. Ideal beta-turns were also modeled and similarly compared with BZD conformers. Huge numbers of conformers were generated by systematically scanning the torsional degrees of freedom for BZDs, as well as those of ideal beta-turns for comparison. Using these structures, conformers of BZDs were fit to experimental structures as suggested by Ripka et al., or modeled classical beta-turn conformers, and the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values were calculated for each pairwise comparison. Pairs of conformers with the smallest RMSD values for overlap of the four alpha-beta side-chain orientations were selected. All overlaps of BZD conformers with experimental beta-turns yielded one or more comparisons where the least RMSD was significantly small, 0.48-0.86 angstroms, as previously suggested. Utilizing a different methodology, the overall conclusion that benzodiazepines could serve as reverse-turn mimetics of Ripka et al. is justified. The least RMSD values for the overlap of BZDs and modeled classical beta-turns were also less than 1 angstrom. When comparing BZDs with experimental or classical beta-turns, the set of experimental beta-turns selected by Ripka et al. fit the BZD scaffolds better than modeled classical beta-turns; however, all the experimental beta-turns did not fit a particular BZD scaffold better. A single BZD ring conformation, and/or chiral orientation, can mimic some, but not all, of the experimental beta-turn structures. BZD has two central ring conformations and one chiral center that explains why the four variations of the BZD scaffold can mimic all types of beta-turn structure examined. It was found, moreover, that the BZD scaffold also mimics each of the nine clusters of experimental orientations of side chains of reverse turns in the Protein Data Bank, when the new classification scheme for the four side-chain directions (the relative orientations of alpha-beta vectors of residues i through i+3) was considered (Tran et al. (2005) J Comput-Aided Mol Des 19:551-566).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Masayuki Hata, Garland R Marshall. 2006-09-14. Do benzodiazepines mimic reverse-turn structures?. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-006-9059-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction of diazepam and its metabolites from hair samples.

An anti-diazepam, molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) has been synthesized and used to extract diazepam and other benzodiazepines from hair samples via a molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction (MISPE) protocol. Optimum retention of diazepam on the MIP columns was achieved using an apolar solvent, and the binding capacity of the polymer toward diazepam was found to be 110 ng of diazepam/mg of polymer. The recovery of a 50 ng diazepam standard spiked into blank hair was 93%, with good precision (RSD = 1.5%). The LOD and LOQ of diazepam in spiked hair samples were 0.09 and 0.14 ng/mg, respectively. The MISPE method was demonstrated to be applicable to the analysis of diazepam metabolites and other benzodiazepine drugs, in addition to diazepam itself. The application of the extraction method to postmortem hair samples yielded results that were in good agreement with the corresponding ELISA data (from blood samples) and data arising from the analysis of the same blood samples using a validated in-house SPE-LC-MS-MS method.

Benzodiazepines↗

Clopidogrel resistance: role of body mass and concomitant medications.

INTRODUCTION: Platelets have a central role in the development of arterial thrombosis and subsequent cardiovascular events. An appreciation of this has made antiplatelet therapy the cornerstone of cardiovascular disease management. Recent studies have described the phenomenon of clopidogrel resistance but the possible mechanisms are still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics (risk profile, previous diseases, medications, hemorheological variables and plasma von Willebrand factor and soluble P-selectin levels) of patients in whom clopidogrel provided effective platelet inhibition with those in whom clopidogrel was not effective in providing platelet inhibition. 157 patients with chronic cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases (83 males, mean age 61+/-11 yrs, 74 females, 63+/-13 yrs) taking 75 mg clopidogrel daily (not combined with aspirin) were included in the study. RESULTS: Compared with clopidogrel-resistant patients (35 patients (22%), patients who demonstrated effective clopidogrel inhibition had a significantly lower BMI (26.1 vs. 28.8 kg/m2, p<0.05). Patients with ineffective platelet aggregation were significantly more likely to be taking benzodiazepines (25% vs. 10%) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (28% vs. 12%) (p<0.05). After an adjustment to the risk factors and medications BMI (OR 2.62; 95% CI: 1.71 to 3.6; p<0.01), benzodiazepines (OR 5.83; 95% CI: 2.53 to 7.1; p<0.05) and SSRIs (OR 5.22; 95% CI: 2.46 to 6.83; p<0.05) remained independently associated with CLP resistance. There was no significant difference in the rheological parameters and in the plasma levels of adhesive molecules between the two examined groups. CONCLUSION: The background of ineffective clopidogrel medication is complex. Drug interactions may play a role on clopidogrel bioavailability, on the other hand, the significant difference in BMI between the two examined groups suggests that clopidogrel therapy should be weight-adjusted.

Benzodiazepines↗