PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17001938

Operating department support level 2 NVQ: Some perceptions.

Abstract

New roles for support staff are emerging and registered practitioners are now being asked to devolve key aspects of patient care. This study explores some of the background issues relating to these developments and provides evidence regarding the inevitability but also benefits, if managed well, of these changes. The experience of both support staff who have undertaken the Operating Department Support National Vocational Qualification Level 2 (ODS NVQ) and their managers was examined using a phenomenological approach. Data was obtained on the perceived value of this qualification and training and how it affected the working lives and career development of support staff.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Janet McAleavy. 2006. Operating department support level 2 NVQ: Some perceptions.. https://doi.org/10.1177/175045890601600906

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

CDM and JI in SWM.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Ethics, Institutional↗

Issues on research integrity: a perspective.

This paper discusses several key issues that are relevant to the integrity and success of the biomedical research enterprise. Attention to these issues will improve research outcomes and reduce negative consequences in research. Subjects addressed include normative practices in research; the importance of quality data; mentoring of young scientists; how to proceed when a member of the scientific community discovers misconduct or other breaches of integrity; and the level of harm to public confidence in research due to misconduct and lack of transparency in research findings.

Ethics, Institutional↗

Whistleblowing and organizational ethics.

The purpose of this article is to discuss an external whistleblowing event that occurred after all internal whistleblowing through the hierarchy of the organization had failed. It is argued that an organization that does not support those that whistle blow because of violation of professional standards is indicative of a failure of organizational ethics. Several ways to build an ethics infrastructure that could reduce the need to resort to external whistleblowing are discussed. A relational ethics approach is presented as a way to eliminate the negative consequences of whistleblowing by fostering an interdependent moral community to address ethical concerns.

Ethics, Institutional↗