PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17014921

An expanded Fermi solution for microbial risk assessment.

Abstract

'Fermi solution' refers to an estimate of a quantity of interest derived from a sequence of guesses about factors of which detailed knowledge is unavailable. When one makes such guesses, it is unlikely that the large majority of them will be either too high or too low. Most probably, some of the overestimates will be offset by some of the underestimates, and the final result will be often close to the correct value. The method has been popularized as recreational physics but it has also been applied in risk assessment, where the factors involved, but not their exact magnitudes, are known. The concept has potential application in certain types of food poisoning risk assessments, and in estimating the number victims of a bioterrorist attack on the food or water supply, where some guessing is inevitable because of the absence of accurate relevant data. We consider a version of the method in which ranges instead of single values are entered as the factors' estimates. For simplicity, the risk to be assessed is taken to be the product of the factors, and their true values are regarded as being uniformly distributed over their respective ranges. The risk itself is therefore construed as a random variable with a probability distribution whose parameters are explicitly determined by the individual factors' ranges and which can often be approximated by a lognormal distribution. The mode of this lognormal distribution is taken to be the "best guess" of the risk, and a credible interval is constructed with a specified level of "confidence". The best guess and credible interval are shown to be robust against small perturbations of the ranges. Thus, even if the ranges are misspecified to some degree, assessments based on the best guess or credible interval will not be substantially altered. This can help to achieve consensus among assessors in situations where very little hard knowledge exists. The calculation procedure has been automated in software that has been made freely available over the Internet. The concept is demonstrated with two hypothetical problems: predicting the number of persons who would come down with acute food poisoning after consuming a contaminated dish, and estimating the number of daily salmonellosis cases in a large metropolitan area.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Micha Peleg, Mark D Normand, Joseph Horowitz, Maria G Corradini. 2006-10-02. An expanded Fermi solution for microbial risk assessment.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.07.020

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Covariates-dependent confidence intervals for the difference or ratio of two median survival times.

In this paper, we are concerned with the estimation of the discrepancy between two treatments when right-censored survival data are accompanied with covariates. Conditional confidence intervals given the available covariates are constructed for the difference between or ratio of two median survival times under the unstratified and stratified Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. The proposed confidence intervals provide the information about the difference in survivorship for patients with common covariates but in different treatments. The results of a simulation study investigation of the coverage probability and expected length of the confidence intervals suggest the one designed for the stratified Cox model when data fit reasonably with the model. When the stratified Cox model is not feasible, however, the one designed for the unstratified Cox model is recommended. The use of the confidence intervals is finally illustrated with a HIV+ data set.

Confidence Intervals↗

Inferences on standardized mean difference: the generalized variable approach.

The standardized mean difference has been widely used as the most common index of effect magnitude in many applied fields. In this paper, we propose a novel approach using the concept of generalized variable for the confidence interval estimation and hypothesis testing of standardized mean difference. Furthermore, we extend this approach to compare standardized mean differences between two studies or between two strata. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach can provide confidence intervals with excellent coverage properties and can perform hypothesis testing with satisfactory type-I error control.

Confidence Intervals↗

Interval estimation for rank correlation coefficients based on the probit transformation with extension to measurement error correction of correlated ranked data.

The Spearman (rho(s)) and Kendall (tau) rank correlation coefficient are routinely used as measures of association between non-normally distributed random variables. However, confidence limits for rho(s) are only available under the assumption of bivariate normality and for tau under the assumption of asymptotic normality of tau. In this paper, we introduce another approach for obtaining confidence limits for rho(s) or tau based on the arcsin transformation of sample probit score correlations. This approach is shown to be applicable for an arbitrary bivariate distribution. The arcsin-based estimators for rho(s) and tau (denoted by rho(s,a), tau(a)) are shown to have asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of 9/pi2 compared with the usual estimators rho(s) and tau when rho(s) and tau are, respectively, 0. In some nutritional applications, the Spearman rank correlation between nutrient intake as assessed by a reference instrument versus nutrient intake as assessed by a surrogate instrument is used as a measure of validity of the surrogate instrument. However, if only a single replicate (or a few replicates) are available for the reference instrument, then the estimated Spearman rank correlation will be downwardly biased due to measurement error. In this paper, we use the probit transformation as a tool for specifying an ANOVA-type model for replicate ranked data resulting in a point and interval estimate of a measurement error corrected rank correlation. This extends previous work by Rosner and Willett for obtaining point and interval estimates of measurement error corrected Pearson correlations.

Confidence Intervals↗