PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17035815

Viral hepatitis.

Abstract

Hepatitis A is still the most frequently reported vaccine preventable disease. A reduction in the incidence will only be achieved by routine childhood vaccination rather than by targeted vaccination of high-risk groups. A larger vaccine program is warranted. Hepatitis B remains a large public health problem. Vaccination targeted to high-risk adults failed to decrease the incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Sexual as well as nosocomial transmission remain serious problems. Vaccine escape variants have also been identified in newborns from infected mothers who had been vaccinated at birth. Clearance of HBV infection results from complex immune mechanisms including TH1 cytokines significantly associated with HLA class II alleles. Escape HBV mutants, especially precore mutants, influence the outcome. The sequences of the promoter and other critical regions were associated with severe activity. Lamivudine is a major advance in therapy of chronic hepatitis B which was recently approved in many countries. Although drug resistant mutants may be selected during therapy, additional nucleoside analogues including adefovir are promising. Optimal combination strategies of different active compounds need to be researched. Three per cent of the world population has been infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Epidemiology has shifted from transfusion to non-transfusion settings. Intravenous drug abuse is currently the main risk but nosocomial infection is also of concern. Three independent factors seem associated with fibrosis progression: age, daily alcohol consumption of 50 g or more and male gender. Median duration of progression to cirrhosis is about 30 years. At the cirrhotic stage, about 3-5% of patients per year develop hepatocellular carcinoma. There is little evidence that direct cytopathicity plays a significant role in liver cell injury. HCV also infects extrahepatic cells which seems critical in the pathogenesis of the many extrahepatic manifestations. The recent identification of CD81 protein as one of the HCV receptor candidates may help us to understand how chronic HCV infection may trigger a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, autoimmune or even lymphoproliferative, through potent continuous B cell activation in the context of various host and/or environmental cofactors. Direct measurement of HCV RNA has clarified HCV replication kinetics and variability. Among patients with chronic hepatitis C, 48 weeks of treatment with interferon/ribavirin therapy produced a response rate of 28% among those with genotype 1 and 66% with other genotypes. Similar differences were found for combination therapy among patients who had relapsed following previous interferon (IFN) therapy. Viral load prior to treatment has been clearly shown to be predictive of response to interferon treatment, with increased viral load associated with decrease rates of response. In patients non-responsive to interferon, a second course of interferon alone has no beneficial effect whereas combination therapy may induce response in 25%. In conclusion, combination therapy should be given in all situations. Viral eradication should not be the only objective of the treatment since histological improvement may be obtained despite persisting viral replication with prolonged maintenance of antiviral therapy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Trépo, F Zoulim, P Pradat. 1999. Viral hepatitis.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001432-199910000-00011

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗